-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 418
Maintain backwards compatibility with wire format from 4.3.0 #629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Nemikolh
wants to merge
7
commits into
GoogleChromeLabs:main
Choose a base branch
from
Nemikolh:compat-4.3.0
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3df8b5c
Maintain backwards compatibility with wire format from 4.3.0
Nemikolh 191bb15
Support multiple format to allow communication with 4.3.0 or older
Nemikolh 0d49cdc
Isolate 4.3.0 test from attack iframe one
Nemikolh 1d8bac0
Revert the addition of BaseMessage, it's not really needed anymore
Nemikolh 5c7458b
Refactor V430* to Legacy* and isV430 to isLegacy
Nemikolh 8ba107a
Simplify markLegacyPort logic and only mark them when needed
Nemikolh fee83e6
Add traversal as it's more useful than anticipated
Nemikolh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is provided for cases where prior knowledge has not been obtained. For instance if instead of doing this:
The caller does:
In this case if inside foo we do:
In this scenario because we don't traverse the object
{ prop: port }
we don't markport
as legacy. We could traverse them but this might have a huge overhead and so I opted for not doing it.Instead the implementer can do:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we want to add the traversal then only
markLegacyPort
needs to be updated