Skip to content

Fix mask node upstream input calculation. #2466

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

singhutsav5502
Copy link
Contributor

@singhutsav5502 singhutsav5502 commented Mar 18, 2025

Closes #2468
Add Manual composition to mask node.
( wasn't sure if i should club this with another PR. )

singhutsav5502 and others added 10 commits March 11, 2025 16:29
Send InputTypes through SendUiMetadata under
odeTypes.
Update NodeCatalog.svelte component to support 	ype based filtering.
Update ContextMenuData to support compatibleType as an input to the searchTerm for the NodeCatalog.
Update Graph.svelte component to support new ContextMenuData enum types.
Send CompatibleType data from rust backend on wire drag and release to NodeCatalog to already show filtered data.
Send InputTypes through SendUiMetadata under
odeTypes.
Update NodeCatalog.svelte component to support 	ype based filtering.
Update ContextMenuData to support compatibleType as an input to the searchTerm for the NodeCatalog.
Update Graph.svelte component to support new ContextMenuData enum types.
Send CompatibleType data from rust backend on wire drag and release to NodeCatalog to already show filtered data.
… sending metadata.

Update NodeCatalog Search filter to support single type search alongside name and category search
…Update missing categories and make sure to remove nodes with empty categories
@singhutsav5502 singhutsav5502 deleted the manual_composition_mask_node branch March 20, 2025 04:02
@Keavon
Copy link
Member

Keavon commented Mar 20, 2025

What's the reason for closing this?

@singhutsav5502
Copy link
Contributor Author

singhutsav5502 commented Mar 20, 2025

I accidentally checked this branch out from the branch responsible for #2423 instead of the master branch.
Merging this would have added code that already has an open PR.
The code change intended for this PR was just a single line for the Mask node definition, If you want i can open a new PR for that or club it along with #2423 .

@Keavon
Copy link
Member

Keavon commented Mar 20, 2025

You can create a new branch with the same name with your 1-line change, push it to your fork, then reopen this PR. #2474 is the replacement, for the record.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants