feat-add-verbose-tags-to-cli

[klnsv]

Summary

Fixed the issue (#28) by adding the --verbose and -v cli arguments

Why

Validation

1. pytest

 uv run pytest -q
warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings discovery:
  TOML parse error at line 66, column 17
     |
  66 | exclude-newer = "5 days"
     |                 ^^^^^^^^
  failed to parse year in date "5 days": failed to parse "5 da" as year (a four digit integer): invalid digit, expected 0-9 but got

......................................................................s......................................... [ 36%]
................................................................................................................ [ 72%]
....................s................................s.............................                              [100%]
304 passed, 3 skipped in 32.23s

2. ruff

 uv run ruff check --fix
uv run ruff format
uv run ty check
warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings discovery:
  TOML parse error at line 66, column 17
     |
  66 | exclude-newer = "5 days"
     |                 ^^^^^^^^
  failed to parse year in date "5 days": failed to parse "5 da" as year (a four digit integer): invalid digit, expected 0-9 but got

Found 3 errors (3 fixed, 0 remaining).
warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings discovery:
  TOML parse error at line 66, column 17
     |
  66 | exclude-newer = "5 days"
     |                 ^^^^^^^^
  failed to parse year in date "5 days": failed to parse "5 da" as year (a four digit integer): invalid digit, expected 0-9 but got

1 file reformatted, 86 files left unchanged
warning: Failed to parse `pyproject.toml` during settings discovery:
  TOML parse error at line 66, column 17
     |
  66 | exclude-newer = "5 days"
     |                 ^^^^^^^^
  failed to parse year in date "5 days": failed to parse "5 da" as year (a four digit integer): invalid digit, expected 0-9 but got

All checks passed!

Checklist

• I added or updated outcome-focused tests for changed business logic.
• I updated documentation for changed behavior, flags, formats, or requirements.
• I ran uv run ruff check --fix, uv run ruff format, and uv run ty check.
• I ran the relevant pytest suite.
• I did not add recordings, generated media, credentials, private URLs, or runtime artifacts.
• I preserved stored-data compatibility or documented an explicit version change.

[github-actions]

👋 Hi @klnsv — thank you so much for your first contribution to HFlow!

A maintainer will review your pull request as soon as possible. In the meantime:

• ⭐ Star the repo: https://github.com/Hebbian-Robotics/hflow
• 💬 Join our Discord: https://discord.gg/vacepQvjmg
• 📖 Check CONTRIBUTING.md for the validation commands CI will run
• 📣 Share the project with your network

💡 Tip: one open pull request per contributor at a time. Issues with an assignee are taken; everything else is fair game.

We are excited to have you here and appreciate your help making the project better! 🙌

[kstonekuan]

Thank you @klnsv, and welcome! This lands #28 exactly as specified: the global -v/--verbose flag, logging.basicConfig before dispatch in main(), the stderr assertion test, and the optional cleanup of the dead logger in episode.py (confirmed it had no logger. call). Validated locally: full quality gate clean and all 304 tests pass. Nice touch saving and restoring the root logger handlers in the test so basicConfig actually takes effect under pytest without leaking state. Merging now.