🐛 test_port_key_sequential_event_generation is still flaky

[GitHK]

What do these changes do?

Just marking to retry, CI fails. Create issue to track #3694

Related issue/s

• M1-12 Maintenance and DevOps osparc-issues#675

How to test

Checklist

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3693 (f9811cc) into master (7ccadab) will decrease coverage by 4.1%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #3693      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    84.4%   80.3%    -4.2%     
=========================================
  Files         883     167     -716     
  Lines       37506    8757   -28749     
  Branches      787     135     -652     
=========================================
- Hits        31681    7034   -24647     
+ Misses       5615    1674    -3941     
+ Partials      210      49     -161     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	78.6% <ø> (+10.7%)	⬆️
unittests	86.4% <ø> (+4.8%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...-v2/src/simcore_service_director_v2/cli/_client.py	0.0% <0.0%> (-100.0%)	⬇️
...v2/src/simcore_service_director_v2/cli/__init__.py	0.0% <0.0%> (-100.0%)	⬇️
...service_director_v2/cli/_close_and_save_service.py	0.0% <0.0%> (-100.0%)	⬇️
...or-v2/src/simcore_service_director_v2/cli/_core.py	0.0% <0.0%> (-87.5%)	⬇️
...ce_director_v2/modules/db/repositories/clusters.py	23.0% <0.0%> (-71.7%)	⬇️
...k/src/simcore_sdk/node_ports_v2/port_validation.py	47.9% <0.0%> (-48.0%)	⬇️
...ervice_director_v2/api/routes/dynamic_scheduler.py	50.0% <0.0%> (-47.1%)	⬇️
...simcore_service_director_v2/api/routes/clusters.py	57.6% <0.0%> (-41.1%)	⬇️
...e_service_director_v2/modules/projects_networks.py	38.2% <0.0%> (-37.1%)	⬇️
...ore_service_director_v2/utils/dask_client_utils.py	46.0% <0.0%> (-34.8%)	⬇️
... and 774 more

[pcrespov]

@GitHK keep an eye on this one ... it might be a hidden bug

[GitHK]

@GitHK keep an eye on this one ... it might be a hidden bug

Yes, I also thought about this. I'll do another review of it next sprint.

[sanderegg]

please do not forget, add the case to the epic, it makes it easier to create the list of changes for the reviews:

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
0.2% Duplication

[GitHK]

closing, out of date