Merge pull request preactjs#583 from joncfoo/patch-1

Fix minor misspelling

content/en/guide/v10/getting-started.md

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ The primary drawback of developing this way is the lack of JSX, which requires a
 
 ### Alternatives to JSX
 
-Writing raw `h` or `createElement` calls can be tedious. JSX has the advantage of looking similar to HTML, which makes it easier to understand for many developers in our experience. JSX requires a built-step though, so we highly recommend an alternative called [HTM][htm].
+Writing raw `h` or `createElement` calls can be tedious. JSX has the advantage of looking similar to HTML, which makes it easier to understand for many developers in our experience. JSX requires a build step though, so we highly recommend an alternative called [HTM][htm].
 
 [HTM][htm] is a JSX-like syntax that works in standard JavaScript. Instead of requiring a build step, it uses JavaScript's own [Tagged Templates](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals#Tagged_templates) syntax, which was added in 2015 and is supported in [all modern browsers](https://caniuse.com/#feat=template-literals). This is an increasingly popular way to write Preact apps, since there are fewer moving parts to understand than a traditional front-end build tooling setup.