Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove jl_task_stack_buffer (again) #57116

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

fingolfin
Copy link
Member

This was removed previously in PR #54527 but had to be reverted in PR #54559 as one usage remained (more by accident then by design). This has since then been resolved.

This is also part of PR #56477 but that seems stalled right now, and in fact merging parts of it now may make the review of it easier later on...

@fingolfin fingolfin added the GC Garbage collector label Jan 21, 2025
@vtjnash vtjnash added the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Jan 21, 2025
@fingolfin fingolfin changed the title Remove jl_task_stack_buffer (again) (#54527) Remove jl_task_stack_buffer (again) Jan 21, 2025
This was removed previously in PR JuliaLang#54527 but had to be reverted in
PR JuliaLang#54559 as one usage remained (more by accident then by design).
This has since then been resolved.
@fingolfin fingolfin force-pushed the mh/jl_task_stack_buffer branch from e76bac2 to 9d2210c Compare January 21, 2025 14:23
@d-netto d-netto merged commit e03de0b into JuliaLang:master Jan 21, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@d-netto d-netto removed the merge me PR is reviewed. Merge when all tests are passing label Jan 21, 2025
@nsajko nsajko added the re-land This relands a PR that was previously merged but was later reverted. label Jan 21, 2025
@fingolfin fingolfin deleted the mh/jl_task_stack_buffer branch January 21, 2025 23:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
GC Garbage collector re-land This relands a PR that was previously merged but was later reverted.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants