Fix Fermi level variation at zero temperature #1059
Draft
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a problem I encountered from AD, but the underlying problem seems to lie in
src/response/chi0.jl
:Currently, for zero temperature the variation of the Fermi level returned by$\varepsilon_F = (HOMO + LUMO)/2$ which we also use in DFTK (cf src/occupation.jl), and disagrees with finite differences.
apply_χ0_4P
is always exactly zero (see chi0.jl). This is inconsistent with the zero-temperature convention to define the Fermi level asHowever, another problem to anticipate is that the zero-temperature definition will be non-differentiable at eigenvalue crossings. I'm not yet sure what the best solution is in such a case. Maybe we can throw a warning if we have near-degenerate eigenvalues at HOMO or LUMO with very different derivatives, indicating an eigenvalue splitting.
TODO list:
apply_χ0_4P
for the variationδεF
of the Fermi level against finite differences.