-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add an API for n-th order tensor products #486
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks guys for starting this! This is a first batch of comments.
src/nlp/api.jl
Outdated
""" | ||
P = tensor_projection(nlp, n, x, directions, args...) | ||
|
||
Returns the projection of the n-th derivative of the objective of `nlp` at `x` along the specified directions. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about tensor_projection
?
You should also have
P = tensor_projection(nlp, n, x, y, directions, args...)
as the default, where by default
P = tensor_projection(nlp, n, x, directions, args...)
call the first one with zeros(n).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that it will be great to have tensor products with both the objective and the Lagrangian.
Should we also add an API for just the constraints, or include a scaling factor \alpha
that can go in front of the objective?
\alpha
can be zero.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it makes sense to be coherent with the other functions like hprod
.
src/nlp/api.jl
Outdated
) where {T, S} | ||
@lencheck nlp.meta.nvar x | ||
m = n - length(directions) | ||
@assert m ≥ 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use NLPModels.@rangecheck instead of @Assert ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we use rangecheck
to ensure inequalities?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not tested, but I would expect @rangecheck 1 typemax(Int) m
to work
cc @michel2323