Conversation
☂️ Python Coverage
Overall Coverage
New FilesNo new covered files... Modified Files
|
joezuntz
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2025
Collaborator
joezuntz
left a comment
joezuntz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi Marc - thanks for getting to this so quickly!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR will close issue #132.
It uses a single-column table to write covariance data. This avoids the problems with the TFIELDS limit of 999, while not needing the significant reorganization that would be required to recover the earlier storage of covariance matrices in FITS images.
This also adds independent version numbers for FITS and HDF5 file formats, in case future changes are needed.