-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc/design: platform v2, physical distributed architecture of the query/control layer #24879
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
doc/design: platform v2, physical distributed architecture of the query/control layer #24879
Conversation
1c251df
to
6e6bdd5
Compare
bee1948
to
be56d36
Compare
|
||
Cons: | ||
|
||
- Hard to see how we can evolve our design to there from our current |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like a good thing to work through! This option seems to me to have the most upside, but certainly has the most open questions. I think until those are resolved a bit more, hard to have an opinion on which is the best end state.
Also I think there's a world in which we evolve to here through something like the Multi-cluster-controllerd, Multi-clusterd Architecture, but it'd be good to flesh out how that would work early on.
Rendered
Related to #23543
Motivation
Part of MaterializeInc/database-issues#6316
Checklist
$T ⇔ Proto$T
mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with aT-proto
label.