Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[copy_from] Support the Parquet format #31173

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

ParkMyCar
Copy link
Member

Stacked on top of #31144

This PR adds a new implementation of a OneshotFormat that supports reading in Parquet files. The decoding is built on top of the ArrowReader implemented in #30958.

The strategy we use for reading and decoding Parquet files is the "split work" stage of a oneshot source will read the footer metadata from a Parquet file to determine the Row Group boundaries. The Row Groups are then distributed among timely works for fetching and eventual decoding.

Note: Through experimentation I found that Row Groups seem to typically be 10s of MB large, which makes them a pretty good unit of parallelization.

Motivation

Fixes https://github.com/MaterializeInc/database-issues/issues/8853

Tips for reviewer

Review on the final commit, the one titled "start, support Parquet for COPY FROM"

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

Copy link
Contributor

@jkosh44 jkosh44 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code LGTM, but we should probably have some tests for Parquet

Comment on lines 151 to 175
if let Some(range) = &range {
let value = format!("bytes={}-{}", range.start(), range.end());
request = request.header(&reqwest::header::RANGE, value);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have tests anywhere or this new param?

@ParkMyCar ParkMyCar force-pushed the copy/from-s3-parquet branch from 3d8c1bf to 378a46b Compare January 30, 2025 16:54
* Add a new Parquet OneshotFormat
* Fix ranged requests for HTTP and AWS sources
@ParkMyCar ParkMyCar force-pushed the copy/from-s3-parquet branch from 378a46b to e6f3e79 Compare January 30, 2025 19:28
@ParkMyCar ParkMyCar enabled auto-merge (squash) January 30, 2025 21:24
@ParkMyCar ParkMyCar merged commit ac3f564 into MaterializeInc:main Jan 30, 2025
77 of 78 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants