Skip to content

jemalloc: use libunwind in profiling #32139

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

teskje
Copy link
Contributor

@teskje teskje commented Apr 9, 2025

This is a workaround for deadlocks caused by nested unwinding, recommended in jemalloc/jemalloc#2282.

This is an attempt to fix https://github.com/MaterializeInc/database-issues/issues/9159

TODO: actually make this work, see thread

Motivation

  • This PR fixes a recognized bug.

Fixes https://github.com/MaterializeInc/database-issues/issues/9159

Tips for reviewer

Checklist

  • This PR has adequate test coverage / QA involvement has been duly considered. (trigger-ci for additional test/nightly runs)
  • This PR has an associated up-to-date design doc, is a design doc (template), or is sufficiently small to not require a design.
  • If this PR evolves an existing $T ⇔ Proto$T mapping (possibly in a backwards-incompatible way), then it is tagged with a T-proto label.
  • If this PR will require changes to cloud orchestration or tests, there is a companion cloud PR to account for those changes that is tagged with the release-blocker label (example).
  • If this PR includes major user-facing behavior changes, I have pinged the relevant PM to schedule a changelog post.

teskje and others added 3 commits April 10, 2025 13:08
This is a workaround for deadlocks caused by nested unwinding,
recommended in jemalloc/jemalloc#2282.
@teskje teskje force-pushed the jemalloc-libunwind branch from f813de1 to 6aec351 Compare April 10, 2025 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants