Skip to content

Beware Earth radius in single precision#326

Open
iboutle wants to merge 9 commits intoMetOffice:mainfrom
iboutle:spbl_fixes
Open

Beware Earth radius in single precision#326
iboutle wants to merge 9 commits intoMetOffice:mainfrom
iboutle:spbl_fixes

Conversation

@iboutle
Copy link

@iboutle iboutle commented Mar 4, 2026

PR Summary

Sci/Tech Reviewer: @Adrian-Lock
Code Reviewer: @mo-alistairp

When represented at single precision, the radius from the centre of the Earth to any model level is only accurate to 0.5m. This is not sufficient accuracy for calculations in the explicit boundary layer scheme, which often calculate delta_z values based off this to higher precision.

To address this, we try to remove as many instances of the use of r_theta_levels and r_rho_levels as possible, focussing instead on height from the surface where possible. If the total distance needs to be retained, it is done so at double precision.

This PR addresses #282

Code Quality Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • Comments have been included that aid understanding and enhance the readability of the code
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • All automated checks in the CI pipeline have completed successfully

Testing

  • I have tested this change locally, using the LFRic Apps rose-stem suite
  • If any tests fail (rose-stem or CI) the reason is understood and acceptable (e.g. kgo changes)
  • I have added tests to cover new functionality as appropriate (e.g. system tests, unit tests, etc.)
  • Any new tests have been assigned an appropriate amount of compute resource and have been allocated to an appropriate testing group (i.e. the developer tests are for jobs which use a small amount of compute resource and complete in a matter of minutes)

trac.log

Test Suite Results - lfric_apps - spbl_fixes/run4

Suite Information

Item Value
Suite Name spbl_fixes/run4
Suite User ian.boutle
Workflow Start 2026-03-05T13:23:33
Groups Run developer', 'lfric_atm_extra
Dependency Reference Main Like
casim MetOffice/casim@2026.03.1 True
jules MetOffice/jules@2026.03.1 True
lfric_apps iboutle/lfric_apps@spbl_fixes False
lfric_core MetOffice/lfric_core@2026.03.1 True
moci MetOffice/moci@2026.03.1 True
SimSys_Scripts MetOffice/SimSys_Scripts@2026.03.1 True
socrates MetOffice/socrates@2026.03.1 True
socrates-spectral MetOffice/socrates-spectral@2026.03.1 True
ukca MetOffice/ukca@2026.03.1 True

Task Information

✅ succeeded tasks - 1314

Security Considerations

  • I have reviewed my changes for potential security issues
  • Sensitive data is properly handled (if applicable)
  • Authentication and authorisation are properly implemented (if applicable)

Performance Impact

  • Performance of the code has been considered and, if applicable, suitable performance measurements have been conducted

AI Assistance and Attribution

  • Some of the content of this change has been produced with the assistance of Generative AI tool name (e.g., Met Office Github Copilot Enterprise, Github Copilot Personal, ChatGPT GPT-4, etc) and I have followed the Simulation Systems AI policy (including attribution labels)

Documentation

  • Where appropriate I have updated documentation related to this change and confirmed that it builds correctly

PSyclone Approval

  • If you have edited any PSyclone-related code (e.g. PSyKAl-lite, Kernel interface, optimisation scripts, LFRic data structure code) then please contact the TCD Team

Sci/Tech Review

  • I understand this area of code and the changes being added
  • The proposed changes correspond to the pull request description
  • Documentation is sufficient (do documentation papers need updating)
  • Sufficient testing has been completed

(Please alert the code reviewer via a tag when you have approved the SR)

Code Review

  • All dependencies have been resolved
  • Related Issues have been properly linked and addressed
  • CLA compliance has been confirmed
  • Code quality standards have been met
  • Tests are adequate and have passed
  • Documentation is complete and accurate
  • Security considerations have been addressed
  • Performance impact is acceptable

@github-actions github-actions bot added the cla-signed The CLA has been signed as part of this PR - added by GA label Mar 4, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from Adrian-Lock March 5, 2026 14:08
@iboutle iboutle marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2026 14:08
Copy link
Contributor

@Adrian-Lock Adrian-Lock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, lots of nice tidying up too.

@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from mo-alistairp March 6, 2026 16:07
Copy link

@MichaelWhitall MichaelWhitall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Ian, this looks fine to me, thanks lots for fixing this and reinstating the comorph_dev rose stem test :)

@iboutle iboutle added this to the Summer 2026 milestone Mar 9, 2026
@iboutle iboutle added the KGO This PR contains changes to KGO label Mar 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla-signed The CLA has been signed as part of this PR - added by GA KGO This PR contains changes to KGO

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants