Skip to content

Fix code quality warnings#45

Draft
Pierre-siddall wants to merge 9 commits intoMetOffice:mainfrom
Pierre-siddall:fix-code-quality-warnings
Draft

Fix code quality warnings#45
Pierre-siddall wants to merge 9 commits intoMetOffice:mainfrom
Pierre-siddall:fix-code-quality-warnings

Conversation

@Pierre-siddall
Copy link
Contributor

@Pierre-siddall Pierre-siddall commented Mar 13, 2026

PR Summary

Code Reviewer:

Dependabot has raised a few issues when it comes to the code quality of MOCI this PR aims to address as many of these issues as possible while maintaining the functionality of MOCI (e.g. not changing rose meta etc) .

Code Quality Checklist

(Some checks are automatically carried out via the CI pipeline)

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • Comments have been included that aid undertanding and enhance the
    readability of the code
  • My changes generate no new warnings

Testing

  • I have tested this change locally, using the Moci rose-stem suite
  • If any tests fail (rose-stem or CI) the reason is understood and
    acceptable (eg. kgo changes)
  • I have added tests to cover new functionality as appropriate (eg. system
    tests, unit tests, etc.)

Security Considerations

  • I have reviewed my changes for potential security issues
  • Sensitive data is properly handled (if applicable)
  • Authentication and authorisation are properly implemented (if applicable)

Performance Impact

  • Performance of the code has been considered and, if applicable, suitable
    performance measurements have been conducted

AI Assistance and Attribution

  • Some of the content of this change has been produced with the assistance
    of Generative AI tool name (e.g., Met Office Github Copilot Enterprise,
    Github Copilot Personal, ChatGPT GPT-4, etc) and I have followed the
    Simulation Systems AI policy
    (including attribution labels)

Documentation

  • Where appropriate I have updated documentation related to this change and
    confirmed that it builds correctly

Code Review

  • All dependencies have been resolved
  • Related Issues have been properly linked and addressed
  • CLA compliance has been confirmed
  • Code quality standards have been met
  • Tests are adequate and have passed
  • Documentation is complete and accurate
  • Security considerations have been addressed
  • Performance impact is acceptable

@Pierre-siddall Pierre-siddall self-assigned this Mar 13, 2026
@Pierre-siddall Pierre-siddall added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants