feat: Adding support for wallet_getCapabilities

[jpuri]

Description

Adding support for wallet_getCapabilities

Related issues

Fixes: https://github.com/MetaMask/MetaMask-planning/issues/4790

Manual testing steps

1. Go to test dapp
2. Click Get Capabilities button and check the result

Screenshots/Recordings

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 81.81818% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.69%. Comparing base (5113000) to head (e8644a1).
Report is 33 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
app/core/RPCMethods/eip5792.ts	81.81%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15047      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.46%   68.69%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files        2372     2379       +7     
  Lines       51275    51426     +151     
  Branches     7634     7663      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits        35103    35328     +225     
+ Misses      13942    13852      -90     
- Partials     2230     2246      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: afac730
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/c2a233df-e2e5-4da9-8527-29cc3e1b9540

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: a13a665
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/e0ad7bd6-74ed-4858-a4e5-f92a236f2312

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
88.9% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[jpuri]

Ignoring bitrise it is currently broken for almost all PRs