Skip to content

Conversation

fingolfin
Copy link
Member

Probably breaking because Hecke already declares this.

There should be more code and docstrings added, but since we are close to a breaking release I thought it would be sensible to get this tiny breaking bit in now, and worry about the rest later.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.16%. Comparing base (7a473f4) to head (49dfd4c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/Ideal.jl 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1924      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.17%   88.16%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         120      120              
  Lines       30303    30305       +2     
==========================================
  Hits        26719    26719              
- Misses       3584     3586       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member Author

Seems to be not even breaking, great

@lgoettgens
Copy link
Member

It can still break older Hecke releases. We don't test that in CI. I'll have a look tomorrow

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member Author

I don't see how it could break older Hecke release -- ideal_type has been in there for quite some time, unchanged. Anyway, I am also happy to wait for 0.44.0 / PR #1925 for this

@lgoettgens lgoettgens merged commit 2248f24 into master Dec 12, 2024
27 of 29 checks passed
@lgoettgens lgoettgens deleted the mh/ideal_type branch December 12, 2024 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants