have vacant seats slightly prefer full reelection on no-confidence #206
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This changes the effective voting preference of vacant SC seats in the event the SC has determined no-confidence, to vote toward full reelection in case a tiebreaker is needed. I think this modest change: - better matches the spirit of having such seats favor reelection in the first place; - better conforms to proportional representation than (the more majoritarian) special elections would; - better incentivizes the SC to prevent seats from going (or staying) vacant. Signed-off-by: cinereal <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This changes the effective voting preference of vacant SC seats in the event the SC has determined no-confidence, to vote toward full reelection in case a tiebreaker is needed.
I think this modest change:
Builds upon #181 to implement my earlier suggestion to this extent.