Update README.md with minimal ethics#1

README.md

@@ -44,3 +44,72 @@ subdirectories for more specific options.
 [firmware image]: https://www.nuand.com/fx3.php (Pre-built firmware binaries)
 [bladeRF-cli]: ./host/utilities/bladeRF-cli (bladeRF Command Line Interface)
 [bladeRF wiki]: https://github.com/nuand/bladeRF/wiki (bladeRF wiki)
+
+Update README.md with minimal ethics#1
+
+What about the application of the Solomonoff induction
+to the RF sensing of human brain?
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference
+
+1. If we assume that the algorithmic complexity
+of neural processes is relatively small
+(you could take a look at the Potapov monography
+for some arguments)
+
+2. As far as I know a lot of neural processes in human brain are electric (or electro-chemistry)
+in nature. They have a little power and a small
+frequency (~ 1-1000 Hz).
+So they emit very low frequency radio waves.
+
+3. You can detect those radio waves on
+small antennas if the impedance of such antennas
+is matched. This is basically the citation
+from the book on electrodynamics.
+I uploaded one such book on Twirpix site.
+
+4. So you can create a lot of such receivers
+- microstrip filter to filter very high frequencies
+- impedance matched microstrip antenna
+- resistor for noise for oversampling
+- very fast comparator to sample signal
+in a very large array on a chip using
+standard CMOS or some sort of full-custom process
+(maybe even with some new materials)
+
+5. BreamForming and large arrays of digital correlators with sub-mm positioning accuracy
+could be achived.
+
+so it seems there is no theoretical
+obstacles to implement some sort of
+RF human brain sensing or even control
+if you can implement reverse structure
+with array of a large amount of RF amplifiers
+with sub-mm beam forming accuracy
+
+BTW I wrote that remark:
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference
+
+What about the application of the Solomonoff induction to the person to person information exchange?
+
+It seems the minimum description length principle could be used to deduce minimum ethics. At least you can compare ethics by the length. What about the following question: how to shoot met-art girl in the dark underground? ~2026-24709-41 (talk) 16:43, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
+
+at least we can ask a question: does russian met-art model from a pic want some money?
+and what obstacles do that guess so hard?
+why it is so hard to contact her directly?
+she lose money, interesting person lose opportunity to make some photos.
+
+also, it seems the economy without coordination primitives based on physics or mathematics
+like gold or maybe Bitcoin or maybe some sort of other physical objects or processes
+is just a chaos.
+Economic calculation based on fiat money is impossible just from scientific methodology
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference
+
+https://transitional-writes.dreamwidth.org/44972.html
+Kirill Abramovich aka wieker @ linux.org.ru
+Samara, Russia
+
+and the most important question:
+what about the minimal ethics deduced from the MDL principle?
+is it exist?
+
+what was the obstacle between russian met-art girls and engineers?