Skip to content

Conversation

ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor

Remove unnecessary "bridging" sentence with ambiguous reference to "rules".

  • schema changes are included in this pull request
  • schema changes are needed for this pull request but not done yet
  • no schema changes are needed for this pull request

@ralfhandl ralfhandl added this to the v3.2.0 milestone Sep 12, 2025
@ralfhandl ralfhandl requested review from a team as code owners September 12, 2025 13:25
@ralfhandl ralfhandl added the editorial Wording and stylistic issues label Sep 12, 2025
@@ -893,8 +893,6 @@ For headers, the header name MUST NOT be included as part of the serialization,
However, names produced by `style: "simple", explode: "true"` are included as they appear within the header value, not as separate headers.
See the [Header Object](#header-object) for special rules for showing examples of the `Set-Cookie` response header, which violates the normal rules for multiple header values.

The following section illustrates these rules.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here "rules" does not mean the "normal rules for multiple header values" mentioned in the directly preceding sentence, it means the rules mentioned in the first paragraph of this section, quite far away.

And this sentence is not really necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
editorial Wording and stylistic issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant