Mark gaz as inactive until issues resolved #1552
Conversation
'postal address is about some geographic location' GAZ should not be used for classes, see OBOFoundry/OBOFoundry.github.io#1552 Fixes obi-ontology/obi#1375 Note that in the future if the is-about axiom is truly valuable (I suspect not) then it can be added back using a GEO class or an ENVO class
matentzn
added
the
attn: OFOC call
|
I think it's undecided whether the source of classes should be GEO or ENVO cc @mbrochhausen @pbuttigieg -- these ontologies are not orthogonal -- but the overall point remains that GAZ shouldn't be the source of classes here |
|
Note there are many tickets for discussing plans to rescue gaz here: https://github.com/EnvironmentOntology/gaz/issues -- I welcome discussion over here |
|
I agree this should be marked inactive. I don't think we need it when other standards such as geonames exist. I view it more like the issues with making gene names available for axioms. |
|
Revision in progress per Lynn. Making a file without instances. Will be just a country list. We will revisit this in November. |
|
In conversation with @lschriml on slack, we will mark GAZ as inactive until she finishes her revisions, at which point we will change it back to active. If anyone sees this comment uncommented after 1 week, you can merge. |
|
This PR has one approving review; does it need more reviews before it can be merged? |
|
Reopening this pull request, to 're-activate' the gaz. See ticket: Lynn |
Discussed at OBO operations call today.
There are some fundamental problems with GAZ: