Skip to content

Conversation

@MiquelRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

...

Copy link
Contributor

@legalsylvain legalsylvain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • PR ok for me. @pedrobaeza what do you think ? Could be merge to allow other PR that depends on the initial one.

  • do you think that we should push in the same time, the update of the analysis. (analysis should change, due to renamings / mergings...)

@legalsylvain
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-3600-by-legalsylvain-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 2d22d11 into OCA:16.0 Nov 13, 2022
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 2d22d11. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@MiquelRForgeFlow MiquelRForgeFlow deleted the 16.0-filling-apriori branch November 14, 2022 08:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants