Skip to content

Conversation

@hbrunn
Copy link
Member

@hbrunn hbrunn commented May 24, 2024

This is the migration of #118 which never made it into v14 proper.

I took the liberty to add a little cronjob that does a periodic export.

@github-actions
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Dec 15, 2024
@tv-openbig tv-openbig added the no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. label Jan 10, 2025
@tv-openbig
Copy link
Contributor

@hbrunn Do you know why the runboat build failed ?

@hbrunn
Copy link
Member Author

hbrunn commented Jun 6, 2025

it does that sometimes, rebasing helps often

/ocabot rebase

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, PR rebased to 15.0.

@tv-openbig tv-openbig added approved and removed stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. labels Jun 6, 2025
@tv-openbig
Copy link
Contributor

tv-openbig commented Jun 6, 2025

@hbrunn I have checked the export. It looks quite good. But did we miss to integrate the default accounts for the suppress machnaism (setting of "BU-Schlüssel") = 40: https://github.com/hbrunn/l10n-germany/blob/14.0-l10n_de_dtvf-init_hook/datev_export_dtvf/models/account_chart_template.py

Thanks for the rebase hint.

@tv-openbig
Copy link
Contributor

@hbrunn I wish to get this PR somehow in the l10n-germany repo. Is it possible to make a functional check on a runboat instance ?

@hbrunn hbrunn closed this Sep 12, 2025
@hbrunn hbrunn reopened this Sep 12, 2025
@hbrunn
Copy link
Member Author

hbrunn commented Sep 12, 2025

/ocabot rebase

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, PR rebased to 15.0.

@hbrunn
Copy link
Member Author

hbrunn commented Sep 12, 2025

@tv-openbig I rebased this again creating a new commit, which is now picked up by runboat correctly

@tv-openbig
Copy link
Contributor

@hbrunn Perfect. Now i can test it properly.
Is it possible to integrate this feature, the predefined boolean field entries for the filed "Suppress Automatic calculations in DATEV": https://github.com/hbrunn/l10n-germany/blob/14.0-l10n_de_dtvf-init_hook/datev_export_dtvf/models/account_chart_template.py

This would be great as otherwise the users would have to research the accounts by themselves.

Bildschirmfoto 2025-09-12 um 14 35 07

@tv-openbig
Copy link
Contributor

@hbrunn Technically it works as expected if i configure the "suppress" boolean account:
Bildschirmfoto 2025-09-12 um 14 46 49

Still i am "bullish" for that module, as it could help a lot in comparision to the odoo EE DATEV export.
It is extremly time consuming to research differences between Odoo and DATEV after an end-to-end
testing.

I do not see this time consuming efforts with that module, especially if we have experienced accountants on the Odoo
side and the tax advisors just want to focus on the end-of-year accounting, creation of balance sheets and doesn't want to spend efforts to fix the differences between Odoo and DATEV ....

@tv-openbig
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot merge major

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 15.0-ocabot-merge-pr-162-by-tv-openbig-bump-major, awaiting test results.

@tv-openbig
Copy link
Contributor

@hbrunn Ich habe es jetzt erstmal übernommen, auch ohne die Einstellungen für das Boolean Feld (siehe oben). Das kann ja gg. nochmal als Patch kommen.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit a19e312 into OCA:15.0 Oct 7, 2025
5 of 7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at a1c5f54. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants