added summary part #1321
added summary part #1321
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a new summary generation feature for snapshots. A Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
frontend/src/types/card.ts (1)
70-70: Consider making the summary field optional.The new
summaryfield has been added as a required property. This could potentially cause TypeScript errors for existing code using this interface if not all usages provide a summary value.- summary: string + summary?: stringfrontend/src/types/snapshot.ts (1)
26-26: Consider making the summary field optional.Similar to the SnapshotCardProps interface, the summary field has been added as required. If there are existing usages of this interface where summary might not be provided, consider making it optional.
- summary: string + summary?: stringbackend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/snapshot.py (1)
20-20: Remove development comment.The comment "✅ Added to expose summary" appears to be a development note and should be removed before merging.
- summary = graphene.String() # ✅ Added to expose summary + summary = graphene.String()backend/apps/owasp/models/snapshot.py (1)
55-72: Good implementation of the summary generation feature!The method is well-structured and provides a clear summary of the snapshot contents. A couple of suggestions for optimization:
- Consider combining the
.exists()and.count()calls to reduce database queries:- if self.new_chapters.exists(): - parts.append(f"{self.new_chapters.count()} chapters") + chapters_count = self.new_chapters.count() + if chapters_count: + parts.append(f"{chapters_count} chapters")
- Consider handling singular/plural forms correctly for better readability:
- parts.append(f"{self.new_chapters.count()} chapters") + count = self.new_chapters.count() + parts.append(f"{count} {'chapter' if count == 1 else 'chapters'}")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/snapshot.py(2 hunks)backend/apps/owasp/models/snapshot.py(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/types/card.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/types/snapshot.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/snapshot.py (2)
backend/apps/github/models/release.py (1)
summary(57-59)backend/apps/owasp/models/snapshot.py (1)
generate_summary(55-72)
frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx (2)
frontend/src/types/card.ts (1)
SnapshotCardProps(64-71)backend/apps/github/models/release.py (1)
summary(57-59)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/snapshot.py (1)
40-43: Implementation looks good.The resolver method correctly calls the
generate_summary()method and returns its result. This matches the implementation pattern of other resolvers in this class.frontend/src/components/SnapshotCard.tsx (2)
7-7: Component properly updated to accept the new summary prop.The component signature has been correctly updated to include the new summary property from the SnapshotCardProps interface.
13-18: Summary display implementation looks good.The summary is conditionally rendered when available, with appropriate styling (text-xs, text-gray-500/text-gray-300 for dark mode) that matches the aesthetic of the card. The text is centered which aligns with the card's design.
|
can you please review this @arkid15r and suggest me if any changes are required or not? i raised this pr because this issue was already crossed its deadline and there are no improvement regarding this issue , as i was already working on this issue,and ready with the solution thats why i raised the pr. |
|
@arkid15r please review this pr once !thank you |
|
hey @arkid15r ,can you please review this pr once ,is there any particular changes required to it.looking forward for your comments |
|
Duplicate of #1336 |
Resolves #1232