leader component refactor #1448
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
frontend/src/app/projects/[projectKey]/page.tsx (1)
59-59: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Potential inconsistency with leaders data format
Line 59 is treating
project.leadersas an array with a.join()method, but the GraphQL query inprojectQueries.tsnow returns leaders as objects with a login property. This might cause runtime errors.- { label: 'Leaders', value: project.leaders.join(', ') }, + { label: 'Leaders', value: project.leaders.map(leader => leader.login).join(', ') },Let's verify this with a script:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check how leaders are used in the codebase rg "project\.leaders" --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 72
Let's search more broadly without relying on file-type filters and inspect both the page and the GraphQL query definition:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # 1. Check for any direct usage of project.leaders echo "##### Searching for project.leaders usage #####" rg "project\.leaders" -n . # 2. Inspect the NextJS page component for a leaders field echo echo "##### Inspecting page.tsx for 'leaders' #####" rg "leaders" -n -g "frontend/src/app/projects/*/page.tsx" # 3. Locate projectQueries.ts and show its 'leaders' selection echo echo "##### Locating projectQueries.ts #####" file=$(fd projectQueries.ts) echo "Found: $file" echo echo "##### Showing GraphQL selection for 'leaders' #####" grep -R "leaders" -n "$file"Length of output: 1219
Let’s inspect the GraphQL selection to confirm the shape of
leaders:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Show surrounding lines for the 'leaders' block in the query grep -R -n -C3 "leaders {" frontend/src/server/queries/projectQueries.tsLength of output: 183
Update mapping for
leadersbefore joiningThe
leadersfield now returns an array of objects ({ login: string }), so calling.join()directly onproject.leaderswill throw at runtime.• File:
frontend/src/app/projects/[projectKey]/page.tsx(line 59)- { label: 'Leaders', value: project.leaders.join(', ') }, + { label: 'Leaders', value: project.leaders.map(leader => leader.login).join(', ') },• You may also need to update other usages—for example in
frontend/src/app/page.tsx(around lines 269–272) replace<LeadersList leaders={String(project.leaders)} />with
<LeadersList leaders={project.leaders.map(l => l.login)} />
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
frontend/src/components/ProjectLeaders.tsx (1)
18-23: Remove console.log statement before deploymentThe console.log on line 22 should be removed before deploying to production.
- console.log('LeaderData:', data)frontend/src/app/projects/[projectKey]/page.tsx (1)
29-31: Remove debugging useEffectThis useEffect appears to be added for debugging purposes. It should be removed before merging to production.
- useEffect(() => { - console.log(`project`, project) - },[project])frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx (4)
49-54: Remove debug console.log statementThe console.log on line 53 appears to be added for debugging purposes and should be removed before production deployment.
const isLeaderData = details?.some((detail) => detail?.label === 'Leaders') const leaders = details.find((detail) => detail.label === 'Leaders')?.value || '' const leadersArray = leaders.split(',').map((leader) => leader.trim()); - console.log('Leaders:', leadersArray)
159-170: Fix indentation in ProjectLeaders componentThe indentation in the ProjectLeaders component is inconsistent with the rest of the file. The props should be aligned with the component name.
{ isLeaderData && ( <ProjectLeaders - leaders={ - leadersArray.reduce((acc, leader) => { - acc[leader] = leader - return acc - }, {} as Record<string, string>) - } + leaders={ + leadersArray.reduce((acc, leader) => { + acc[leader] = leader + return acc + }, {} as Record<string, string>) + } /> ) }
159-170: Consider simplifying the leaders object creationThe current approach of using reduce to create an object where keys equal values could be simplified using Object.fromEntries or a more declarative approach.
{ isLeaderData && ( <ProjectLeaders leaders={ - leadersArray.reduce((acc, leader) => { - acc[leader] = leader - return acc - }, {} as Record<string, string>) + Object.fromEntries(leadersArray.map(leader => [leader, leader])) } /> ) }
159-172: Remove extra blank linesThere are excessive blank lines following the ProjectLeaders component that should be removed to maintain consistent spacing in the file.
} } - {topContributors && (
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
frontend/src/app/about/page.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/app/projects/[projectKey]/page.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/ProjectLeaders.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/server/queries/projectQueries.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
frontend/src/server/queries/projectQueries.ts (1)
12-14: Structured leader data retrieval looks goodThe GraphQL query now explicitly requests the
loginfield from leaders, which aligns well with the newProjectLeaderscomponent structure. This change ensures that leader objects have the necessary data fields for proper display.frontend/src/components/ProjectLeaders.tsx (4)
1-7: Clean importsThe imports are well-organized and include all necessary dependencies for the component.
8-16: Well-defined TypeScript interfacesThe interfaces are clear and properly define the component props, including optional properties.
24-31: Loading and error states handled properlyThe component properly handles loading and error states, providing appropriate feedback to users.
50-62: Clean and well-structured component implementationThe
ProjectLeaderscomponent is well-organized with good use of props and conditional rendering.frontend/src/app/about/page.tsx (2)
22-22: Clean import for the new componentThe import for the ProjectLeaders component is properly added.
85-85: Simplified leader display with reusable componentReplacing the previous leader display implementation with the new
ProjectLeaderscomponent improves code reusability and maintainability.frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx (2)
26-26: New import added for ProjectLeaders componentThe import for the new ProjectLeaders component follows the existing import pattern in the file. This aligns with the refactoring to centralize leader display logic.
49-170: Consider potential duplication with existing LeadersList componentThe file now contains two different ways to display leader information - the existing approach using
LeadersList(line 92) and the new approach usingProjectLeaders. If this is intended as a transition, consider adding a comment explaining this or complete the migration by removing the old implementation.Is the plan to eventually replace all instances of
LeadersListwithProjectLeaders? If so, you may want to consider updating line 92 to use the new component for consistency.
| return ( | ||
| <UserCard | ||
| avatar={user.avatarUrl} | ||
| button={{ | ||
| icon: <FontAwesomeIconWrapper icon="fa-solid fa-right-to-bracket" />, | ||
| label: 'View Profile', | ||
| onclick: () => window.open(`/members/${username}`, '_blank', 'noopener,noreferrer'), | ||
| }} | ||
| className="h-64 w-40 bg-inherit" | ||
| company={user.company} | ||
| description='description' | ||
| location={user.location} | ||
| name={user.name || username} | ||
| /> | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix hardcoded description value
The component uses a hardcoded 'description' value instead of the description prop that's passed to the component.
- description='description'
+ description={description}Also, note that you're passing the description prop in the function parameters, but not using it in the component:
- const LeaderData = ({ username }: { username: string; description: string }) => {
+ const LeaderData = ({ username, description }: { username: string; description: string }) => {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return ( | |
| <UserCard | |
| avatar={user.avatarUrl} | |
| button={{ | |
| icon: <FontAwesomeIconWrapper icon="fa-solid fa-right-to-bracket" />, | |
| label: 'View Profile', | |
| onclick: () => window.open(`/members/${username}`, '_blank', 'noopener,noreferrer'), | |
| }} | |
| className="h-64 w-40 bg-inherit" | |
| company={user.company} | |
| description='description' | |
| location={user.location} | |
| name={user.name || username} | |
| /> | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| const LeaderData = ({ username, description }: { username: string; description: string }) => { | |
| return ( | |
| <UserCard | |
| avatar={user.avatarUrl} | |
| button={{ | |
| icon: <FontAwesomeIconWrapper icon="fa-solid fa-right-to-bracket" />, | |
| label: 'View Profile', | |
| onclick: () => window.open(`/members/${username}`, '_blank', 'noopener,noreferrer'), | |
| }} | |
| className="h-64 w-40 bg-inherit" | |
| company={user.company} | |
| description={description} | |
| location={user.location} | |
| name={user.name || username} | |
| /> | |
| ) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents (early access)
In frontend/src/components/ProjectLeaders.tsx around lines 33 to 48, the UserCard component is using a hardcoded string 'description' instead of the description prop passed to the component. Replace the hardcoded 'description' value with the description prop variable to correctly display the passed description.
| const isLeaderData = details?.some((detail) => detail?.label === 'Leaders') | ||
| const leaders = details.find((detail) => detail.label === 'Leaders')?.value || '' | ||
| const leadersArray = leaders.split(',').map((leader) => leader.trim()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null check for details in find method
While you've added optional chaining for the some() method, you should also add it for the find() method to prevent potential TypeErrors if details is undefined.
const isLeaderData = details?.some((detail) => detail?.label === 'Leaders')
- const leaders = details.find((detail) => detail.label === 'Leaders')?.value || ''
+ const leaders = details?.find((detail) => detail?.label === 'Leaders')?.value || ''
const leadersArray = leaders.split(',').map((leader) => leader.trim());📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const isLeaderData = details?.some((detail) => detail?.label === 'Leaders') | |
| const leaders = details.find((detail) => detail.label === 'Leaders')?.value || '' | |
| const leadersArray = leaders.split(',').map((leader) => leader.trim()); | |
| const isLeaderData = details?.some((detail) => detail?.label === 'Leaders') | |
| const leaders = details?.find((detail) => detail?.label === 'Leaders')?.value || '' | |
| const leadersArray = leaders.split(',').map((leader) => leader.trim()); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents (early access)
In frontend/src/components/CardDetailsPage.tsx around lines 49 to 51, the find method is called on details without optional chaining, which can cause a TypeError if details is undefined. Add optional chaining to the find call by changing details.find to details?.find to safely handle cases when details is undefined.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/project.py (1)
78-79: Why is the resolver method commented out?The commented-out resolver method seems unnecessary as GraphQL will use the default resolver to return
self.leaders.all(). However, having it commented out rather than removed or implemented is confusing and inconsistent with the rest of the codebase where explicit resolvers are used for other fields.Either remove the commented code entirely or uncomment and use it for consistency with other resolvers in this file:
-# def resolve_leaders(self, info): -# return self.leaders.all() +def resolve_leaders(self, info): + """Resolve leaders.""" + return self.leaders.all()
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/project.py(3 hunks)backend/apps/owasp/migrations/0032_project_leaders.py(1 hunks)backend/apps/owasp/models/project.py(2 hunks)frontend/src/server/queries/projectQueries.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- frontend/src/server/queries/projectQueries.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/project.py (1)
backend/apps/github/graphql/nodes/user.py (1)
UserNode(16-60)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
backend/apps/owasp/graphql/nodes/project.py (2)
8-8: Good addition of the UserNode import.The import is correctly added to support the new leaders field in the ProjectNode class.
22-22: Properly defined GraphQL field for project leaders.The leaders field is correctly defined as a list of UserNode objects, which will expose project leaders through the GraphQL API.
backend/apps/owasp/models/project.py (2)
13-13: Good addition of the User model import.The import is correctly added to support the new leaders field in the Project model.
81-85: Well-defined ManyToMany relationship for project leaders.The leaders field is properly defined as a ManyToManyField with appropriate parameters:
- The relationship targets the User model
- Uses a descriptive related_name for reverse lookups
- Has blank=True to make it optional
This implementation allows for multiple users to be associated as leaders of a project and for users to lead multiple projects.
backend/apps/owasp/migrations/0032_project_leaders.py (1)
1-23: Migration properly created for adding the leaders field.This migration correctly:
- Adds the leaders ManyToManyField to the Project model
- References all necessary dependencies
- Uses the same field attributes (blank=True, related_name="led_projects") as defined in the model
The migration will set up the necessary database tables to support the many-to-many relationship between projects and users.
|
@yashgoyal0110 when this one is going to be ready for review? |
|
|
fixes: #1431