Skip to content

Astropy: Hardening Astropy's Core Stability (Dhruv Yadav)#4

Open
dhruv1955 wants to merge 12 commits intoOpenAstronomy:mainfrom
dhruv1955:astropy-hardening-dhruv-yadav
Open

Astropy: Hardening Astropy's Core Stability (Dhruv Yadav)#4
dhruv1955 wants to merge 12 commits intoOpenAstronomy:mainfrom
dhruv1955:astropy-hardening-dhruv-yadav

Conversation

@dhruv1955
Copy link

@dhruv1955 dhruv1955 commented Mar 15, 2026

Requirements

@dpshelio

This comment was marked as outdated.

@dhruv1955 dhruv1955 marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2026 16:16
@dhruv1955 dhruv1955 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 17, 2026 16:16
@dhruv1955 dhruv1955 marked this pull request as draft March 17, 2026 19:06
@dhruv1955 dhruv1955 marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2026 12:43
@dhruv1955
Copy link
Author

@dpshelio could you regenerate the PDF with the latest changes? The proposal has been updated with additional PRs, timeline dates, and other comments section.

Also, should I submit this auto-generated PDF to the GSoC portal, or is there a different version I should use?

@dhruv1955
Copy link
Author

@neutrinoceros @astrofrog @nstarman - tagging you here as my GSoC 2026 proposal mentors. The proposal reflects work already underway - 9 of 14 PRs merged, including direct extension tests for _parse_times.c (#19410) and scalar_inv_efuncs.pyx (#19407), and a C-level bug fix (#19457) found by reading source directly. Happy to answer any questions.

@neutrinoceros
Copy link

Hi @dhruv1955, first of all, thank you for all your contributions so far. However I need to say that we don't want to select a candidate based on existing contributions explicitly made towards the project, for fear that it would create an incentive for applicants to essentially do the work for free before the project even starts, as well as bias our selection towards candidates that have more free time than others.

It's a tough spot to be in. You're obviously very motivated and the record shows your work is very much appreciated, but I need to temper your expectations.

@dhruv1955
Copy link
Author

@neutrinoceros thank you for being direct - I appreciate the transparency. I understand the concern about creating unfair incentives.

My contributions were driven by curiosity about the codebase rather than as a strategy for selection, but I understand why that distinction can be difficult to assess externally.

I'll let the proposal speak for itself, and I'm looking forward to the evaluation process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants