Skip to content

fix: Buf wrong action hash#164

Merged
alex289 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/wrong_action_hash
May 13, 2026
Merged

fix: Buf wrong action hash#164
alex289 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/wrong_action_hash

Conversation

@alex289
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@alex289 alex289 commented May 13, 2026

@alex289 alex289 requested a review from timokoessler May 13, 2026 14:59
@alex289 alex289 self-assigned this May 13, 2026
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 13, 2026 14:59
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the ci label May 13, 2026
@alex289 alex289 enabled auto-merge (squash) May 13, 2026 15:00
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the pinned commit SHA for the bufbuild/buf-action GitHub Action in the CI and CodeQL workflows, addressing the “wrong action hash” code-scanning findings linked in the PR description.

Changes:

  • Update bufbuild/buf-action from SHA 219c9aef... to fd21066d... in the CodeQL workflow.
  • Update bufbuild/buf-action from SHA 219c9aef... to fd21066d... in the main CI workflow.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
.github/workflows/codeql.yml Re-pins bufbuild/buf-action to the corrected commit SHA for CodeQL runs.
.github/workflows/ci.yml Re-pins bufbuild/buf-action to the corrected commit SHA for CI runs.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@alex289 alex289 merged commit 3a6efce into main May 13, 2026
13 checks passed
@alex289 alex289 deleted the fix/wrong_action_hash branch May 13, 2026 15:03
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants