Skip to content

Conversation

@slifty
Copy link
Collaborator

@slifty slifty commented Jan 5, 2026

This PR adds additional unit tests to the project, as part of a larger test coverage effort

Related to #33

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 3.64%. Comparing base (34c8552) to head (a492a1c).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main    #769      +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage   0.59%   3.64%   +3.05%     
========================================
  Files         33      33              
  Lines       1015    1015              
  Branches     158     158              
========================================
+ Hits           6      37      +31     
+ Misses      1009     978      -31     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slifty slifty changed the title WIP: Add more tests Add more tests (Stage 1) Jan 5, 2026
@slifty slifty marked this pull request as ready for review January 5, 2026 20:25
Base automatically changed from 33-add-codecov to main January 5, 2026 21:18
slifty added 5 commits January 5, 2026 16:20
This also introduces the concept of a test factory; as we add more tests
these factories may be used across various tests.

Issue #33 We need tests
@slifty slifty force-pushed the 33-add-more-unit-tests branch from 1977101 to a492a1c Compare January 5, 2026 21:21
@slifty slifty enabled auto-merge January 5, 2026 21:22
@slifty slifty merged commit 3a97507 into main Jan 5, 2026
6 checks passed
@slifty slifty deleted the 33-add-more-unit-tests branch January 5, 2026 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants