Skip to content

Conversation

@slifty
Copy link
Collaborator

@slifty slifty commented Jan 5, 2026

This PR adds unit tests for the remaining utils.

Related to #33

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 6.10%. Comparing base (3a97507) to head (c13a48b).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main    #770      +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage   3.64%   6.10%   +2.46%     
========================================
  Files         33      33              
  Lines       1015    1015              
  Branches     158     158              
========================================
+ Hits          37      62      +25     
+ Misses       978     953      -25     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@liam-lloyd liam-lloyd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After synchronous discussion of how we want to consistently structure our tests @slifty and I concluded the its here should be tests

@slifty slifty force-pushed the 33-add-more-unit-tests-part-2 branch from 0f724cc to c13a48b Compare January 7, 2026 19:17
@slifty slifty requested a review from liam-lloyd January 7, 2026 19:18
@slifty slifty merged commit cc53de8 into main Jan 7, 2026
8 checks passed
@slifty slifty deleted the 33-add-more-unit-tests-part-2 branch January 7, 2026 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants