[Components] brosix #13436 #16082
[Components] brosix #13436 #16082
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis pull request removes two obsolete files and introduces new modules to enhance the Brosix functionality. The deleted files include a Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User/Trigger
participant S as Send Message Action
participant A as Brosix App Module
participant API as Brosix API
U->>S: Trigger send-message action
S->>A: Call sendMessage(message)
A->>A: Prepare HTTP request (_makeRequest)
A->>API: Send request (base URL + path)
API-->>A: Return response
A-->>S: Pass along response
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/brosix/brosix.app.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/brosix/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs (1)
18-27: Consider adding error handlingThe run method correctly calls the app's sendMessage method and exports a summary on success. However, there's no error handling for failed requests.
async run({ $ }) { - const response = await this.app.sendMessage({ - $, - params: { - msg: this.msg, - }, - }); - $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the message"); - return response; + try { + const response = await this.app.sendMessage({ + $, + params: { + msg: this.msg, + }, + }); + $.export("$summary", "Successfully sent the message"); + return response; + } catch (error) { + $.export("$summary", `Failed to send message: ${error.message}`); + throw error; + } },components/brosix/brosix.app.mjs (2)
34-40: Add parameter validation to sendMessage methodThe sendMessage method should validate that a message is provided before making the API request.
async sendMessage(args = {}) { + const { params } = args; + if (!params?.msg) { + throw new Error("Message is required"); + } return this._makeRequest({ path: "/message/send/", method: "post", ...args, }); },
17-32: Consider enhancing error handlingThe _makeRequest method should include error handling with more descriptive error messages to aid troubleshooting.
async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { const { $ = this, path, params, ...otherOpts } = opts; - return axios($, { - ...otherOpts, - url: this._baseUrl() + path, - params: { - "apikey ": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, - ...params, - }, - }); + try { + return await axios($, { + ...otherOpts, + url: this._baseUrl() + path, + params: { + "apikey": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, + ...params, + }, + }); + } catch (error) { + const statusCode = error.response?.status; + const statusText = error.response?.statusText; + const detail = error.response?.data?.detail || error.message; + throw new Error(`Brosix API error: ${statusCode} ${statusText} - ${detail}`); + } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/brosix/.gitignore(0 hunks)components/brosix/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/brosix/app/brosix.app.ts(0 hunks)components/brosix/brosix.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/brosix/package.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/brosix/.gitignore
- components/brosix/app/brosix.app.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/brosix/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs (2)
4-8: Action metadata looks goodThe action key, name, description with documentation link, version, and type are properly defined following Pipedream conventions.
9-17: Props are defined correctlyThe props include the app instance and a message property that uses a propDefinition from the app.
components/brosix/package.json (3)
3-3: Version bump to 0.1.0 is appropriateThe version increase from 0.0.3 to 0.1.0 follows semantic versioning principles for a minor feature addition (adding a new send message action).
5-5: Main entry point simplifiedThe main entry point has been updated to point directly to "brosix.app.mjs" instead of "dist/app/brosix.app.mjs", reflecting the new file structure.
15-16: Added required dependencyThe "@pipedream/platform" dependency is correctly added, which is needed for the axios import used in the app file.
components/brosix/brosix.app.mjs (2)
3-12: App definition and prop definitions look goodThe app type, name, and property definitions are correctly configured.
14-16: Base URL method is properly implementedThe _baseUrl method returns the correct API endpoint for Brosix.
|
/approve |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/brosix/brosix.app.mjs (1)
13-42: Consider adding error handling and JSDoc comments.The methods implementation is functional, but lacks error handling and documentation. Consider:
- Adding try-catch blocks to handle API errors gracefully
- Including JSDoc comments to document the purpose, parameters, and return values of each method
methods: { + /** + * Returns the base URL for the Brosix API + * @returns {string} The base URL + */ _baseUrl() { return "https://box-n2.brosix.com/api/v1"; }, + /** + * Makes an authenticated request to the Brosix API + * @param {Object} opts - Request options + * @param {Object} opts.$ - Context object + * @param {string} opts.path - API endpoint path + * @param {Object} opts.params - Query parameters + * @returns {Promise<Object>} API response + */ async _makeRequest(opts = {}) { const { $ = this, path, params, ...otherOpts } = opts; + try { return axios($, { ...otherOpts, url: this._baseUrl() + path, params: { "apikey": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, ...params, }, }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Request to Brosix API failed:", error); + throw error; + } }, + /** + * Sends a message via the Brosix API + * @param {Object} args - Method arguments + * @returns {Promise<Object>} API response + */ async sendMessage(args = {}) { + try { return this._makeRequest({ path: "/message/send/", method: "post", ...args, }); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to send message:", error); + throw error; + } }, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/brosix/brosix.app.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/brosix/brosix.app.mjs (4)
1-12: Good job implementing the Brosix app module.The app configuration and property definitions are well structured. The message property definition includes a clear description that will be helpful for users.
14-16: LGTM for the base URL implementation.The private method naming convention with the underscore prefix is correctly applied.
17-32: Good implementation of the request handler.The request construction is well implemented with proper parameter handling. I notice the "apikey" parameter no longer has the trailing space that was previously flagged in an earlier review.
34-40: Consider whether the trailing slash is necessary in the API path.The path
/message/send/includes a trailing forward slash. Depending on the Brosix API specifications, this might or might not be required.You may want to verify against the Brosix API documentation whether this trailing slash is intentional and required for proper API functionality.
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores