Skip to content

Conversation

@taimoorzaeem
Copy link
Collaborator

Add a note describing that the used JSPath DSL does not strictly follow the JSONPath as described in RFC 9535.

Closes #4092.

.. note::

The JSPath DSL used here is implemented as a custom feature and does not strictly follow the `RFC 9535 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9535.html>`_.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Which feature here specifically does extend the RFC?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The string comparison feature implemented in #3813. Let me mention that here.

Add a note describing that the used JSPath DSL does not
strictly follow the JSONPath as described in RFC 9535
@steve-chavez steve-chavez merged commit 1258ea6 into PostgREST:main May 18, 2025
4 checks passed
@taimoorzaeem taimoorzaeem deleted the docs/jsonpath-rfc branch May 19, 2025 15:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs should clarify that the JSONPath to be used jwt-role-claim-key is not RFC compliant

2 participants