perf: use new PyLong* API for num-bigint feature#6144
Open
chirizxc wants to merge 28 commits into
Open
CodSpeed HQ / CodSpeed Performance Analysis
succeeded
Jun 30, 2026 in 0s
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 23 improved benchmarks
✅ 117 untouched benchmarks
Performance Changes
| Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | into_bigint_huge_negative |
23.6 µs | 6.6 µs | ×3.6 |
| ⚡ | extract_biguint_negative_fail |
7.2 µs | 2.3 µs | ×3.2 |
| ⚡ | extract_biguint_zero |
2,758.9 ns | 946.1 ns | ×2.9 |
| ⚡ | into_bigint_huge_positive |
17.4 µs | 6.7 µs | ×2.6 |
| ⚡ | into_biguint_huge |
17.1 µs | 6.7 µs | ×2.6 |
| ⚡ | into_bigint_big_negative |
5.3 µs | 2.1 µs | ×2.5 |
| ⚡ | into_bigint_small |
3.2 µs | 1.5 µs | ×2.1 |
| ⚡ | into_bigint_big_positive |
4.5 µs | 2.1 µs | ×2.1 |
| ⚡ | into_biguint_big |
4.3 µs | 2.2 µs | +96.34% |
| ⚡ | into_biguint_small |
3.3 µs | 2 µs | +68.45% |
| ⚡ | extract_bigint_small |
2.7 µs | 1.8 µs | +53.52% |
| ⚡ | extract_bigint_huge_negative |
13 µs | 8.5 µs | +52.37% |
| ⚡ | extract_biguint_small |
2.6 µs | 1.7 µs | +50.52% |
| ⚡ | into_biguint_zero |
2.9 µs | 2 µs | +41.44% |
| ⚡ | extract_biguint_huge |
11.8 µs | 8.5 µs | +37.87% |
| ⚡ | extract_bigint_huge_positive |
11.7 µs | 8.5 µs | +37.36% |
| ⚡ | extract_bigint_big_negative |
3.9 µs | 3.4 µs | +14.46% |
| ⚡ | extract_i128_small_pos |
1.2 µs | 1.1 µs | +14.18% |
| ⚡ | extract_i128_zero |
1.3 µs | 1.1 µs | +13.81% |
| ⚡ | extract_i128_small_neg |
1.3 µs | 1.2 µs | +13.06% |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing chirizxc:PyLongForBigInt (b1899b6) with main (126aa44)
Loading