-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Read carbon capture data from new DEA industry sheets #20
Conversation
Read in for direct air capture and post combustion capture on a small biomass CHP and a cement kiln.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can merge this branch. In the long-term I would like to
(1) remove the extra function add_carbon_capture(data) and rather include processing the data in the previous steps
(2) add as well the costs for gas CHPs CCS/ carbon capture from p.86 DEA version 0009
(3) than remove the function add_costs_ccs(costs) which currently adds costs for CCS from DIW
@@ -929,6 +926,31 @@ def add_gas_storage(data): | |||
|
|||
return data | |||
|
|||
def add_carbon_capture(data, tech_data): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it would be better to include the technology in the previous functions to handle the data instead of writing a single function for carbon capture
scripts/compile_cost_assumptions.py
Outdated
@@ -1054,8 +1079,6 @@ def rename_ISE(costs_ISE): | |||
costs = add_co2_intensity(costs) | |||
# CCS | |||
costs = add_costs_ccs(costs) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this function still needed or can it be removed? we should use the CCS costs for gas CHPs from DEA p.86
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ | |||
'biogas upgrading': '82 Biogas, upgrading', | |||
'battery': '180 Lithium Ion Battery', | |||
'electrolysis': '88 Alkaline Electrolyser', | |||
'direct air capture' : '403.a Direct air capture', | |||
'biomass CHP capture' : '401.a Post comb - small CHP', | |||
'cement capture' : '401.c Post comb - Cement kiln', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we can also check if they have gas CHP capture in DEA
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it does, in section '07 CO2 Capture and Storage'
(I just realized you mentioned the same in another comment)
I.e. if only carbon capture is involved, but second step of sequestration or usage is not yet clear, rename CCS as CC.
I agree. We can merge this branch, but @nworbmot maybe want to address @lisazeyen before merging |
Hi both, yes, I agree with @lisazeyen's points. I'm just tidying up the scripts a bit now. I have removed the redundant function "add_costs_ccs", i.e. point (3). That doesn't address points (1) and (2) but it's a start. Will push soon, then merge, then do a release to coincide with PyPSA-Eur-Sec v0.4.0. |
This has been replaced by DEA "cement capture" assumptions.
Read in for direct air capture and post combustion capture on a small biomass CHP and a cement kiln.