Skip to content

feat: ✨ Add support for role gradient colors in Role #2818

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Paillat-dev
Copy link
Contributor

@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev commented Jun 22, 2025

Summary

Information

  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting,
    examples, ...).

Checklist

  • I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.
  • I have updated the changelog to include these changes.

@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev changed the title feat: ✨ Add support for enhanced role colors in Role feat: ✨ Add support for role gradient colors in Role Jun 22, 2025
@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev marked this pull request as ready for review June 22, 2025 13:30
@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev requested a review from a team as a code owner June 22, 2025 13:30
@pullapprove4 pullapprove4 bot requested a review from VincentRPS June 22, 2025 13:30
@Paillat-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested and works for me but it'd like some other people to test it thx !

@Paillat-dev
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also do not merge before discord/discord-api-docs#7549

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants