Skip to content

Revert 2814 revert 2774 emoji #2820

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Lumabots
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Information

  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting,
    examples, ...).

Checklist

  • I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.
  • I have updated the changelog to include these changes.

Lumabots added 2 commits June 25, 2025 11:11
PartialEmojiConverter now recognizes standard Unicode emojis using a new UNICODE_EMOJIS set loaded from emojis.json. The emoji mapping and set are moved to discord.utils for reuse, and references in partial_emoji.py are updated accordingly.
@Lumabots Lumabots requested a review from a team as a code owner June 25, 2025 08:16
@Lumabots Lumabots marked this pull request as draft June 25, 2025 08:21
@Lumabots Lumabots marked this pull request as ready for review June 25, 2025 08:23
@Lumabots
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Paillat-dev did you mean like this ? for #2815

@Paillat-dev
Copy link
Contributor

Yrah

@Lulalaby Lulalaby merged commit 293c5ed into Pycord-Development:revert-2814-revert-2774-emoji Jun 25, 2025
26 of 28 checks passed
@Lumabots Lumabots deleted the revert-2814-revert-2774-emoji branch June 25, 2025 12:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants