You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: lectures/ge_arrow.md
+18-6Lines changed: 18 additions & 6 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -328,7 +328,9 @@ Two examples would be
328
328
329
329
We'll write down implications of Markov asset pricing in a nutshell for two types of assets
330
330
331
-
* the price in Markov state $s$ at time $t$ of a **cum dividend** stock that entitles the owner at the beginning of time $t$ to the time $t$ dividend and the option to sell the asset at time $t+1$. The price evidently satisfies $p^h(\bar s_i) = d^h(\bar s_i) + \sum_j Q_{ij} p^h(\bar s_j) $, which implies that the vector $p^h$ satisfies $p^h = d^h + Q p^h$ which implies the formula
331
+
* the price in Markov state $s$ at time $t$ of a **cum dividend** stock that entitles the owner at the beginning of time $t$ to the time $t$ dividend and the option to sell the asset at time $t+1$.
332
+
333
+
* The price evidently satisfies $p^h(\bar s_i) = d^h(\bar s_i) + \sum_j Q_{ij} p^h(\bar s_j) $, which implies that the vector $p^h$ satisfies $p^h = d^h + Q p^h$ which implies the formula
332
334
333
335
$$
334
336
p^h = (I - Q)^{-1} d^h
@@ -337,7 +339,9 @@ $$
337
339
338
340
339
341
340
-
* the price in Markov state $s$ at time $t$ of an **ex dividend** stock that entitles the owner at the end of time $t$ to the time $t+1$ dividend and the option to sell the stock at time $t+1$. The price is
342
+
* the price in Markov state $s$ at time $t$ of an **ex dividend** stock that entitles the owner at the end of time $t$ to the time $t+1$ dividend and the option to sell the stock at time $t+1$.
343
+
344
+
The price is
341
345
342
346
$$
343
347
p^h = (I - Q)^{-1} Q d^h
@@ -582,7 +586,9 @@ even if he consumes zero goods forevermore.
582
586
583
587
```{prf:remark}
584
588
If we have an Inada condition at zero consumption or just impose that consumption
585
-
be nonnegative, then in a *finite horizon* economy with sequential trading of one-period Arrow securities there is no need to impose natural debt limits. See the section on a [finite horizon economy](#finite-horizon) below.
589
+
be nonnegative, then in a *finite horizon* economy with sequential trading of one-period Arrow securities there is no need to impose natural debt limits.
590
+
591
+
See the section on a [finite horizon economy](#finite-horizon) below.
At the initial state $s_0 \in \begin{bmatrix} \bar s_1, \ldots, \bar s_n \end{bmatrix}$,
640
-
the continuation wealth $\psi^k(s_0) = 0$ for all agents $k = 1, \ldots, K$. This indicates that
646
+
the continuation wealth $\psi^k(s_0) = 0$ for all agents $k = 1, \ldots, K$.
647
+
648
+
This indicates that
641
649
the economy begins with all agents being debt-free and financial-asset-free at time $0$, state $s_0$.
642
650
```
643
651
@@ -771,13 +779,17 @@ Note that $\sum_{k=1}^K \psi_t^k = {0}_{n \times 1}$ for all $t \in {\bf T}$.
771
779
772
780
```{prf:remark}
773
781
At the initial state $s_0 \in \begin{bmatrix} \bar s_1, \ldots, \bar s_n \end{bmatrix}$,
774
-
for all agents $k = 1, \ldots, K$, continuation wealth $\psi_0^k(s_0) = 0$. This indicates that
782
+
for all agents $k = 1, \ldots, K$, continuation wealth $\psi_0^k(s_0) = 0$.
783
+
784
+
This indicates that
775
785
the economy begins with all agents being debt-free and financial-asset-free at time $0$, state $s_0$.
776
786
```
777
787
778
788
779
789
```{prf:remark}
780
-
Note that all agents' continuation wealths return to zero when the Markov state returns to whatever value $s_0$ it had at time $0$. This will recur if the Markov chain makes the initial state $s_0$ recurrent.
790
+
Note that all agents' continuation wealths return to zero when the Markov state returns to whatever value $s_0$ it had at time $0$.
791
+
792
+
This will recur if the Markov chain makes the initial state $s_0$ recurrent.
0 commit comments