Skip to content

chore(ci): Lock instead of freezing in PR CI during dependency sync#1717

Merged
maximilianruesch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mr/ci/uv-lock
May 5, 2026
Merged

chore(ci): Lock instead of freezing in PR CI during dependency sync#1717
maximilianruesch merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mr/ci/uv-lock

Conversation

@maximilianruesch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This fails when the uv.lock is not up to date, which has been a problem in a number of instances (such that subsequent PRs find themselves needing to include seemingly random uv.lock changes). --locked vs --frozen strictly tightens the requirements for success.

Also happy to pursue a separate action instead of modifying this one if required.

@maximilianruesch maximilianruesch requested a review from aborgna-q May 5, 2026 12:47
@maximilianruesch maximilianruesch marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2026 12:47
@maximilianruesch maximilianruesch requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2026 12:47
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchmr/ci/uv-lock
TestbedLinux
Click to view all benchmark results
Benchmarkhugr_bytesBenchmark Result
bytes x 1e3
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
bytes x 1e3
(Limit %)
hugr_nodesBenchmark Result
nodes
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
nodes
(Limit %)
tests/benchmarks/test_big_array.py::test_big_array_compile📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
158.77 x 1e3
(0.00%)Baseline: 158.77 x 1e3
160.36 x 1e3
(99.01%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,641.00
(0.00%)Baseline: 6,641.00
6,707.41
(99.01%)
tests/benchmarks/test_ctrl_flow.py::test_many_ctrl_flow_compile📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
27.53 x 1e3
(0.00%)Baseline: 27.53 x 1e3
27.81 x 1e3
(99.01%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
1,074.00
(0.00%)Baseline: 1,074.00
1,084.74
(99.01%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_benchmark_compile📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
10.91 x 1e3
(0.00%)Baseline: 10.91 x 1e3
11.02 x 1e3
(99.01%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
308.00
(0.00%)Baseline: 308.00
311.08
(99.01%)
tests/benchmarks/test_queue_push_pop.py::test_queue_push_pop_benchmark_compile📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
14.84 x 1e3
(0.00%)Baseline: 14.84 x 1e3
14.99 x 1e3
(99.01%)
📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
435.00
(0.00%)Baseline: 435.00
439.35
(99.01%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.47%. Comparing base (561882f) to head (581952c).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1717   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.47%   93.47%           
=======================================
  Files         133      133           
  Lines       12697    12713   +16     
=======================================
+ Hits        11868    11884   +16     
  Misses        829      829           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 5, 2026

Congrats! CodSpeed is installed 🎉

🆕 9 new benchmarks were detected.

You will start to see performance impacts in the reports once the benchmarks are run from your default branch.

Detected benchmarks


Open in CodSpeed

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@aborgna-q aborgna-q left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@maximilianruesch maximilianruesch added this pull request to the merge queue May 5, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit a1aa699 May 5, 2026
11 checks passed
@maximilianruesch maximilianruesch deleted the mr/ci/uv-lock branch May 5, 2026 14:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants