-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
async client support #276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
bshakur8
wants to merge
1
commit into
RamiAwar:main
Choose a base branch
from
bshakur8:async
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
async client support #276
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
| from datetime import datetime | ||
| from typing import Optional | ||
|
|
||
| from pydantic import Field | ||
|
|
||
| from pydastic import ESAsyncModel | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Car(ESAsyncModel): | ||
| model: str | ||
| year: Optional[int] | ||
| last_test: datetime = Field(default_factory=datetime.now) | ||
|
|
||
| class Meta: | ||
| index = "car" |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know it's a duplicate code. My suggestion is to separate it to pre & post functions for each
save,getanddeletefunctions. Those pre&post function will be shared betweenESModelandESAsyncModel.The only difference between them is that the later will use
awaitin AsyncES client function.For example:
@RamiAwar Do you agree with this approach or do you have a better one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorryy totally missed this! Will check
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, here are my thoughts @bshakur8:
The operation classes are a bit of an overkill - they make understanding the code much more complicated. Having a little bit of duplication is better if it makes maintenance and extendability easier. Maybe functions are a better alternative here. Maybe we can put the pre- and post- logic in functions that we'd then simply call in both clients.
We should have 2 clients - an async one and a sync one. I don't like the idea of supporting sync and async operations on the same client as it's complicating something that should be simple. Users will either use the sync client, or they will use the async client, never both. Also every other ORM I've seen uses this same idea, so we shouldn't stray from the standard.
The tests look amazing, the async logic looks solid. That's for that! We'll definitely merge that in as soon as we address the first two points.
What do you think? I'm willing to draft a more detailed suggestion if you want.