chore: add pr-comments workflow with default messages #1591
Conversation
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow file ( Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant PR as "Pull Request"
participant GH as "GitHub Actions"
participant Ext as "External Auto-Comments Workflow"
PR->>GH: Trigger (opened, ready for review, closed)
GH->>Ext: Invoke pr-comments job using external workflow
Ext-->>GH: Process and post comment on PR
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
requested review from
aimensahnoun,
alexandre-abrioux,
kevindavee and
yomarion
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pr-comments.yml (2)
3-6: Trigger Event ConfigurationThe workflow triggers on the
pull_request_targetevent with types[opened, ready_for_review, closed], which effectively covers key PR lifecycle events. Please double-check thatpull_request_targetis the intended event, as it runs with elevated permissions, and ensure that the elevated scope is acceptable within your security model.
10-13: External Workflow UsageThe job reuses an external workflow from
RequestNetwork/auto-commentsvia theusesdirective, and it passes the parameterorg_name: "RequestNetwork". This approach promotes reusability and ensures that default comments are maintained centrally. The inline comment (line 13) is helpful to document this design decision.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pr-comments.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build-and-test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/pr-comments.yml (3)
1-2: File Metadata and NamingThe workflow file is appropriately titled "PR Comments", clearly indicating its purpose.
7-9: Job Definition ClarityThe
pr-commentsjob is well defined with a descriptive name ("PR Comments"). This enhances clarity when reviewing workflow runs and logs.
14-15: Secrets ManagementThe workflow securely injects a token from
${{ secrets.GH_PAT_AUTO_COMMENTS }}to authenticate with the external workflow. This is a good practice for managing credentials. Please verify that the token's permissions are scoped appropriately to limit any potential security risks.
Description
This Pull Request adds the
pr-comments.ymlworkflow which posts customizable comments on Pull Requests submitted by external contributors (those outside the RequestNetwork organization).The workflow leaves comments in these situations:
Details
It uses the
GH_PAT_AUTO_COMMENTSorganization secret which is a Personal Access Token provided by @MantisClone (me). Thus, the comments look like they're being posted by me.Default messages
First PR Comment:
Ready for Review Comment:
Merged Comment:
Test
This test pull request created by an external user shows 3 messages being sent at the appropriate times.
Context
Towards:
Considerations
pr-comments.ymlworkflow is installed using the@maintag so this repo will pull the latest default messages from the auto-comments repo as soon as they're merged to themainbranch.Reference
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit