[Feat.] PR evaluation workflow with automatic robustness evaluation#56
Conversation
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request effectively integrates an automatic robustness evaluation into the PR workflow. The changes are well-structured across dataset preparation, prediction generation, validation, and scoring. The README has also been updated accordingly. I've identified a few areas for improvement, mainly concerning code duplication, error handling, and a minor logging inconsistency. Addressing these will enhance the maintainability and robustness of the new evaluation pipeline.
|
Did we run a full PR test for all evaluation metrics? |
|
Is this sufficient? I saw the Arenascore and others are empty. |
Yes, it's sufficient, other metrics are empty just because i dont run llm inference, i put placeholder on the |
…ion.py Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…s.py Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully integrates an automatic robustness evaluation into the PR workflow. The changes are comprehensive, touching dataset preparation, prediction generation, validation, and scoring. The README is also updated accordingly.
I've identified a few areas for improvement:
- There's a minor bug in the logging of the robustness score, which misrepresents the 'flip ratio'.
- In several places, broad
except Exceptionblocks are used, which could be narrowed to more specific exceptions to improve error handling and prevent masking other issues.
Overall, this is a great addition to the project. My detailed comments are below.
|
Looks like everything is settled from this issue result |
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request successfully integrates an automatic robustness evaluation into the RouterArena workflow. The changes are well-structured across multiple scripts, including dataset preparation, prediction generation, validation, and score computation. The README.md has also been updated accordingly.
I've found one critical issue: a typo in a filename within scripts/process_datasets/prep_datasets.py which would break the data preparation step for the robustness evaluation. I've also noted a minor issue with a misleading log message. Please see the specific comments for details.
Overall, this is a great feature addition that enhances the evaluation capabilities of RouterArena.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
Adds automatic robustness evaluation to the RouterArena PR workflow.
Key Features
Robustness Evaluation Integration
The robustness evaluation pipeline is now fully integrated into the existing codebase:
Dataset preparation:
prep_datasets.pyautomatically downloads the robustness split from the RouterArena dataset.Prediction generation:
generate_prediction_file.pyaccepts a--robustnessflag to run router inference specifically for the robustness split.Config and file checking:
check_config_prediction.pyaccepts a--robustnessflag to validate the corresponding prediction file, ensuring correct structure and routing outputs.Score computation:
llm_evaluation/run.pyadds arobustnessoption to compute robustness metrics independently, without performing LLM inference.Workflow integration:
pr-evaluation.ymlhas been updated so that robustness evaluation is automatically executed and included in the workflow results.README Update
The README has been updated to document all robustness-related features, including dataset preparation, prediction file generation, configuration checks, score computation.
Workflow Verification
Please refer to this closed PR-comment to understand the details.