⚡ Bolt: Remove unused O(N^2) topic lookup in TranscriptViewer#48
⚡ Bolt: Remove unused O(N^2) topic lookup in TranscriptViewer#48google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
- Removes `getSegmentTopic` function which performed nested iterations over topics and segments. - Removes the unused call to this function inside the transcript render loop. - This eliminates an O(N * T * S) complexity overhead during every render of the transcript list (where N=transcript segments, T=topics, S=segments in topic).
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project Preview Branches by Supabase. |
💡 What: Removed the unused
getSegmentTopicfunction and its invocation inside theTranscriptViewerrender loop.🎯 Why: The function was performing a nested loop search (O(N*M)) for every transcript segment on every render, but its return value was completely ignored. This was wasting significant CPU cycles during playback and scrolling.
📊 Impact: Reduces render time complexity from roughly O(N * Topics * TopicSegments) to O(N) (ignoring other overheads), making the transcript viewer more responsive, especially for long videos with many topics.
🔬 Measurement:
pnpm lintandpnpm buildconfirmed no regressions. The change is safe as the function was pure and unused.PR created automatically by Jules for task 4111486572657234099 started by @SamuelZ12