docs: add standard project README#86
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
WalkthroughREADME and repository metadata were updated: new title/logo/badges, Tech Stack and Project Checklist replaced prior workflow content, repository links and Getting Started instructions added, app screenshots and user-flow placeholders included, MIT LICENSE and minor Contributing.md formatting changes added. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment Tip CodeRabbit can generate a title for your PR based on the changes.Add |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 201-204: Replace the "## 📍 License" TODO with the chosen license
text summary and add a top-level LICENSE file; update the README's "## 📍
License" section to name the license (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0, GPL-3.0), include a
short blurb about permissions/limitations, and reference the new LICENSE file,
and create the corresponding LICENSE file with the full license text and
year/owner details to match repository ownership.
- Line 7: The img element referencing "public/logos/logo.svg" is missing an alt
attribute; update the <img src="public/logos/logo.svg" width="155" /> tag to
include an appropriate alt string (e.g., alt="Project logo" or a more
descriptive label) so screen readers can describe the logo for accessibility.
- Line 132: The markdown heading "## �🍀 Getting Started" contains a corrupted
replacement character; open the README and replace the corrupted "�" with the
correct Unicode character (either remove it so the heading is "## 🍀 Getting
Started" or replace it with a plain ASCII alternative like "## Getting
Started"); ensure the file is saved with UTF-8 encoding so the emoji renders
correctly and re-run a preview to confirm the heading shows "🍀 Getting Started"
as intended.
- Around line 107-109: The fenced code block containing "[User Flow Diagram
Placeholder]" lacks a language specifier; update that block by either adding a
language tag (e.g., change ``` to ```text) around the existing "[User Flow
Diagram Placeholder]" or replace the fenced block with a blockquote (prefix the
line with "> ") so the placeholder is rendered correctly and avoids a bare,
untyped code fence.
- Around line 67-70: Update the README tech stack lines that list ambiguous
slash-separated alternatives (the entries "Solidity / solana / cardano / ergo",
"Hardhat / foundry", "Web3.js / Ethers.js / Wagmi", "OpenZeppelin / alchemy /
Infura") to explicitly state which platforms and tools the project actually
uses, or clarify multi-platform support; for example, replace the ambiguous
slashed entries with either a single chosen platform/tool (e.g., "Solidity (EVM
chains)" and "Hardhat") or a clear statement like "Supports: Solidity (EVM),
Solana, Cardano; Tools: Hardhat, Foundry (optional)" so readers can
unambiguously know whether the repo targets EVM only or multiple blockchains.
- Around line 196-197: Remove or replace the placeholder maintainer entry
"[Maintainer Name](https://github.com/username)" in the README: either delete
that line if there's only one maintainer or replace it with the real
maintainer's name and GitHub URL to reflect actual contributors.
- Line 190: Update the incorrect placeholder contribution link in the README:
replace the URL
"https://github.com/AOSSIE-Org/Template-Repo/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md"
referenced by the "Contribution Guidelines" link with the correct repository's
CONTRIBUTING.md URL (i.e.,
https://github.com/<actual-owner>/<actual-repo>/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md),
ensuring the anchor text "Contribution Guidelines" remains unchanged.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 68d939e6-f537-4b98-8ce9-bece5291d5ea
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
|
@khushal1512 there are some valid issues pointed out by coderabbit so please fix them. |
fix(docs): Add bash language specifier to CONTRIBUTING.md commands feat(docs): Add MIT Open Source LICENSE
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
75-177:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorReplace remaining template TODO placeholders before merging.
Line 77, Line 106, Line 112, Line 135, and Line 177 still expose template TODO content, plus placeholder journeys at Line 114-127. This leaves key onboarding and architecture sections incomplete for users/contributors.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` around lines 75 - 177, The README still contains unresolved template TODOs under headings "✅ Project Checklist", "🔄 User Flow" (including the placeholder "User Flow Diagram Placeholder" and the "Key User Journeys" list), "🍀 Getting Started" prerequisites/installation steps, and "📱 App Screenshots"; replace each TODO with concrete project-specific content (complete the checklist items or remove irrelevant checks, provide actual user flow diagrams or links and fill in the three Key User Journeys with real steps, confirm and list required prerequisites and installation commands if different, and add real screenshots or remove the section) so the README is fully actionable and not a template before merging.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 189: Update the README link target to match the actual filename casing:
replace the string "CONTRIBUTING.md" with "Contributing.md" in README.md (the
line that currently links to the Contribution Guidelines) so the hyperlink
points to the existing Contributing.md file on case-sensitive filesystems.
- Line 211: Update the copyright line "© 2025 Stable-Order" in the README to
match the LICENSE metadata by replacing it with "© 2026 Stability Nexus"; locate
the exact string in README (the line containing © 2025 Stable-Order) and change
the year and owner to 2026 and Stability Nexus so README and LICENSE are
consistent.
---
Outside diff comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 75-177: The README still contains unresolved template TODOs under
headings "✅ Project Checklist", "🔄 User Flow" (including the placeholder "User
Flow Diagram Placeholder" and the "Key User Journeys" list), "🍀 Getting
Started" prerequisites/installation steps, and "📱 App Screenshots"; replace
each TODO with concrete project-specific content (complete the checklist items
or remove irrelevant checks, provide actual user flow diagrams or links and fill
in the three Key User Journeys with real steps, confirm and list required
prerequisites and installation commands if different, and add real screenshots
or remove the section) so the README is fully actionable and not a template
before merging.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 54335c4b-e09f-4022-9091-3eaf255e4dc8
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
LICENSEREADME.md
fix(doc): Align LICENSE with README
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
75-177:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 MajorReplace core TODO placeholders before merging the “standard README.”
Line 77, Line 106, Line 112, Line 135, and Line 177 are still placeholders in critical sections (checklist, flows, prerequisites, screenshots). This leaves onboarding incomplete and conflicts with the PR objective of adding a standard project README.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` around lines 75 - 177, The README still contains TODO placeholders in the "Project Checklist", "User Flow"/"Key User Journeys", "Prerequisites", and "App Screenshots" sections; replace those placeholders with concrete project-specific content: fill "Project Checklist" items that apply (protocol, smart contracts, deployment details), provide real user flow diagrams or links and flesh out the three "Key User Journeys" steps, list exact developer prerequisites (Node.js version, package manager, any SDKs or wallet tools), and add real screenshots or remove the placeholder; update the headings "✅ Project Checklist", "🔄 User Flow"/"Key User Journeys", "🍀 Getting Started" -> "Prerequisites", and "📱 App Screenshots" accordingly so the README is no longer using generic TODOs.
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
README.md (1)
211-211:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorAlign README copyright with LICENSE metadata.
Line 211 (
© 2025 Stable-Order) is inconsistent withLICENSE(2026 The Stable Order). Keep year and owner naming identical across both files.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@README.md` at line 211, The README contains the literal string "© 2025 Stable-Order" which mismatches the LICENSE metadata "2026 The Stable Order"; update the README entry so the year and owner string exactly match the LICENSE (e.g., change "© 2025 Stable-Order" to "© 2026 The Stable Order") or vice versa so both files use the identical year and owner naming.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Outside diff comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 75-177: The README still contains TODO placeholders in the
"Project Checklist", "User Flow"/"Key User Journeys", "Prerequisites", and "App
Screenshots" sections; replace those placeholders with concrete project-specific
content: fill "Project Checklist" items that apply (protocol, smart contracts,
deployment details), provide real user flow diagrams or links and flesh out the
three "Key User Journeys" steps, list exact developer prerequisites (Node.js
version, package manager, any SDKs or wallet tools), and add real screenshots or
remove the placeholder; update the headings "✅ Project Checklist", "🔄 User
Flow"/"Key User Journeys", "🍀 Getting Started" -> "Prerequisites", and "📱 App
Screenshots" accordingly so the README is no longer using generic TODOs.
---
Duplicate comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 211: The README contains the literal string "© 2025 Stable-Order" which
mismatches the LICENSE metadata "2026 The Stable Order"; update the README entry
so the year and owner string exactly match the LICENSE (e.g., change "© 2025
Stable-Order" to "© 2026 The Stable Order") or vice versa so both files use the
identical year and owner naming.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 6898b85b-39f8-4b7d-9376-71ce6994d558
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Contributing.mdLICENSEREADME.md
|
Made the changes suggested by CodeRabbit, this is ready to be merged |
|
@KanishkSogani this is ready to be merged.. |
2 participants
Addressed Issues:
#82
Fixes #(TODO:issue number)
Screenshots/Recordings:
TODO: If applicable, add screenshots or recordings that demonstrate the interface before and after the changes.
Additional Notes:
AI Usage Disclosure:
We encourage contributors to use AI tools responsibly when creating Pull Requests. While AI can be a valuable aid, it is essential to ensure that your contributions meet the task requirements, build successfully, include relevant tests, and pass all linters. Submissions that do not meet these standards may be closed without warning to maintain the quality and integrity of the project. Please take the time to understand the changes you are proposing and their impact. AI slop is strongly discouraged and may lead to banning and blocking. Do not spam our repos with AI slop.
Check one of the checkboxes below:
I have used the following AI models and tools: TODO
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
License