Repository navigation
docs: refresh README and testing guidance - #33
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 SummarySummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe README revises feature descriptions, links to system design and build dependency guides, and clarifies JaCoCo coverage-report paths and CI publication. ChangesREADME documentation
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Other Suggested reviewers: Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The reviewed README changes accurately describe recovery behavior and CI report publication and are ready to merge.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Correct material recovery claims, move artifact settings into Docs and complete dependency and test-report guidance.
Follows the README layout and documentation ownership rules in TF-Minecraft/Docs. Related guide updates: TF-Minecraft/Docs#110.
Validation:
git diff --check; README links, source paths and anchors checked against the task worktrees. Feature and test claims checked against current source and build configuration. Plugin/runtime suites were not rerun for these documentation edits.