Update detail-stack implementation after #784 - #798
Merged
Merged
Conversation
joukewitteveen
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2025
Member
|
Thanks for catching this! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#784 (which split
UnityPrintNumberByStyle) was developed in parallel to #775 (which added another use ofUnityPrintNumberByStyle), so when both were merged, the optional detail-stack no longer worked.This was noticed by @joukewitteveen here.
This updates the implementation of the detail-stack.
I considered (re)adding
UnityPrintNumberByStyleas a wrapper to support either uint or int, but I think that would defeat the point of the split.