Tony363 · Tony363 · Mar 10, 2026 · Mar 9, 2026 · Mar 9, 2026 · Mar 9, 2026
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+# Code Review Skill Import from Ocelot
+
+**Date**: 2026-03-08
+**Source**: `~/Desktop/Ocelot/.claude/commands/code-review.md`
+**Target**: `.claude/skills/sc-code-review/SKILL.md`
+
+## Import Summary
+
+Successfully imported and adapted the code-review skill from Ocelot to SuperClaude framework with significant enhancements.
+
+## Key Enhancements Imported
+
+### 1. Interactive Philosophy - "Ask Early, Ask Often"
+- Liberally uses `AskUserQuestion` at every decision point
+- User directs the review flow instead of receiving fire-and-forget report
+- Interactive checkpoints throughout the review process
+
+### 2. Scope Confirmation (Phase 1b)
+- Presents summary before review starts
+- Options to narrow, expand, or change focus
+- User can select specific files/directories to review
+- Prevents wasted effort reviewing wrong scope
+
+### 3. Large Diff Handling (Phase 5)
+- Interactive strategy selection for diffs > 1000 lines
+- Options: chunked review, high-risk only, full pass, or user selection
+- Prevents context overflow and improves review quality
+
+### 4. Model Disagreement Resolution (Phase 6a)
+- Surfaces disagreements between models
+- User adjudicates severity conflicts
+- Option to dismiss false positives
+- Up to 4 disagreements per question
+
+### 5. Critical/High Findings Validation (Phase 6b)
+- User confirms critical/high severity items before finalizing
+- Prevents false positives that erode trust
+- Uses `mcp__pal__challenge` for adversarial validation
+- Unselected items downgraded to Medium with note
+
+### 6. Post-Review Follow-Up (Phase 8)
+- Always asks user what to do next
+- Options: auto-fix, deep-dive, post to PR, re-review, done
+- Auto-fix with severity selection (critical, high, medium, all)
+- File-specific deep-dive with max context (-U20)
+- Re-review with different model selection
+
+## Structural Changes
+
+### From Ocelot Format
+```
+.claude/commands/code-review.md
+- description: (in frontmatter)
+- allowed-tools: (in frontmatter)
+- argument-hint: (in frontmatter)
+```
+
+### To SuperClaude Format
+```
+.claude/skills/sc-code-review/SKILL.md
+- name: sc-code-review (in frontmatter)
+- description: (enhanced in frontmatter)
+- allowed-tools: (added AskUserQuestion, Edit, Glob)
+```
+
+## Tool Additions
+
+### New Tools Added
+- `AskUserQuestion` - Interactive decision points
+- `Edit` - Auto-fix issues based on findings
+- `Glob` - File discovery for large diffs
+- `mcp__pal__challenge` - Adversarial validation of critical findings
+
+### Existing Tools Retained
+- `Bash` - Git operations
+- `Read` - Source file inspection
+- `Grep` - Pattern search
+- `mcp__pal__consensus` - Multi-model consensus
+- `mcp__pal__codereview` - Single-model fallback
+- `mcp__pal__listmodels` - Model discovery
+
+## Behavioral Flow Comparison
+
+### Ocelot (10 steps)
+1. Parse Arguments
+2. Validate Git State
+3. Discover Available Models
+4. Gather Git Context
+5. Categorize Changed Files
+6. Handle Large Diffs
+7. Run PAL MCP Consensus
+8. Format Output
+9. Optional: Post to PR
+10. Post-Review Follow-Up
+
+### SuperClaude (13 steps)
+1. Parse Arguments
+2. Validate Git State
+3. **Confirm Scope** (new - interactive)
+4. Discover Available Models
+5. Gather Git Context
+6. Categorize Changed Files
+7. **Handle Large Diffs** (enhanced - interactive)
+8. Run PAL MCP Consensus
+9. **Resolve Disagreements** (new - interactive)
+10. **Validate Findings** (new - interactive)
+11. Format Output
+12. **Follow-up** (enhanced - interactive)
+13. Optional: Post to PR
+
+## Philosophy Alignment
+
+Both versions emphasize user direction, but SuperClaude implementation adds:
+- More explicit `AskUserQuestion` patterns
+- Clearer decision tree for each checkpoint
+- Adversarial validation with `mcp__pal__challenge`
+- Multi-select for granular control (fix scope, focus areas)
+
+## Compatibility
+
+### Backward Compatible
+- All original flags work: `commits`, `--staged`, `--branch`, `--focus`, `--post-pr`
+- All original modes: Commits, Staged, Branch comparison
+- All original focus areas: security, performance, quality, architecture, full
+
+### New Features
+- `--models` flag to control consensus size (2-5 models)
+- Interactive scope refinement before review
+- User validation of critical/high findings
+- Post-review action menu with auto-fix
+
+## Testing Recommendations
+
+1. **Basic flow**: `/sc:code-review` with default 5 commits
+2. **Scope confirmation**: Test "Too much" and "Too little" paths
+3. **Large diff**: Create 1500+ line diff, test chunking options
+4. **Model disagreement**: Review code with known edge cases
+5. **Critical findings**: Test validation and challenge workflow
+6. **Auto-fix**: Test fix scope selection and Edit integration
+7. **PR posting**: Test with and without `--post-pr` flag
+
+## Migration Notes
+
+### For Ocelot Users
+If migrating from Ocelot to SuperClaude:
+1. Replace `/code-review` with `/sc:code-review`
+2. All flags work the same
+3. Expect more interactive prompts (can skip with "Looks good — proceed")
+4. New auto-fix capability in follow-up menu
+
+### For SuperClaude Users
+If you were using the old `sc-code-review`:
+1. Same invocation: `/sc:code-review`
+2. Much more interactive — be prepared to answer questions
+3. Better false positive prevention on critical findings
+4. New post-review auto-fix workflow
+
+## Future Enhancements
+
+Potential additions based on Ocelot patterns:
+- [ ] Add `--notify` flag for Rube MCP integrations (Slack, Jira)
+- [ ] Save review templates for recurring review patterns
+- [ ] Multi-repo review support (review changes across multiple repos)
+- [ ] Review history tracking and comparison
+- [ ] Custom severity definitions per project
+- [ ] Integration with issue trackers (auto-create issues from findings)
+
+## Credits
+
+- **Original Author**: Ocelot framework code-review command
+- **Adapted By**: SuperClaude framework integration
+- **Key Innovation**: Interactive, user-directed review flow with adversarial validation