Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @eliandoran, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the custom map functionality by enabling users to define their own map layers via URLs and providing a new control to hide marker labels for better visual clarity. It also includes a refactoring of the map layer management system for increased flexibility and an improvement to the checkbox property component to handle inverted boolean states more intuitively. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces several improvements to the custom map feature. It adds the ability to show or hide marker names, supports custom raster map layers via URL, and includes a refactoring of how map layers are handled by passing a layerData object instead of just a layer name. The changes are well-structured, and the new reverseValue property on checkboxes is a nice UX improvement. I've found one issue related to incorrect dependencies in a useMemo hook that could lead to stale UI. Overall, great work on enhancing the map functionality.
| color: note.getLabelValue("color") ?? "blue" | ||
| } | ||
| }), [ color, iconClass ]); | ||
| }), [ color, iconClass, hideLabels ]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The dependency array for useMemo is not correctly capturing all dependencies, which can lead to stale data for the track options.
colorandiconClass(from lines 282-283) are arrays returned byuseNoteLabel([value, setter]). Their references are stable across re-renders, souseMemowill not re-evaluate when the label values change. You should destructure the value from them (e.g.,const [colorValue] = useNoteLabel(...)) and usecolorValuein the dependency array.note.titleis used on line 287 to build thestartIcon, but it's not listed as a dependency. To make it reactive to changes, you should useconst title = useNoteProperty(note, "title");and includetitlein the dependency array.note.getLabelValue("color")is used forpolyline_optionson line 294. Thecolorvalue fromuseNoteLabelshould be used here as well to ensure consistency and reactivity.
A full fix would involve changes outside of this line, but the dependency array should be updated to include all reactive values it depends on.
No description provided.