-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
우산 반납/대여 관련 슬랙 메시지 개선 #495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
""" WalkthroughThe changes remove unrefunded rental tracking and Slack notifications in the umbrella rental return flow within the controller. They enforce non-nullable Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant RS as RentService
participant DB as Database
participant SA as SlackAlarmService
U->>RS: addRental(umbrella, rental info)
RS->>DB: Save rental history
RS->>SA: notifyRent(user, history)
alt Condition report provided
RS->>DB: Save condition report
RS->>SA: notifyConditionReport(conditionReport)
end
sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant RS as RentService
participant DB as Database
participant SA as SlackAlarmService
participant IS as ImprovementReportService
U->>RS: returnUmbrellaByUser(return info)
RS->>DB: Update history (bank details, return store meta)
RS->>SA: notifyReturn(user, history, unrefundedCount)
alt Improvement report provided
RS->>IS: save(improvementReport)
RS->>SA: notifyImprovementReport(improvementReport)
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt (1)
28-28: Changed rentStoreMeta from val to varThe
rentStoreMetaproperty has been changed from immutable (val) to mutable (var). This increases flexibility by allowing the rental store to be updated after aHistoryobject is created.While this provides more flexibility, ensure proper validation is in place when this property is modified to maintain data integrity.
Consider adding a setter method with validation instead of directly exposing a mutable property, especially for important entity relationships:
-var rentStoreMeta: StoreMeta, +val rentStoreMeta: StoreMeta, + +fun updateRentStore(newStore: StoreMeta) { + // Add any validation logic here + this.rentStoreMeta = newStore +}src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt (2)
113-113: Potential performance concern for frequent calls.
countUnrefundedRent()might be called repeatedly if returns happen in quick succession. Consider caching or batching if performance becomes an issue.
115-116: Order of operations in notifyReturn vs. save.
Consider persistinghistorybefore callingnotifyReturn. If the Slack message triggers any downstream checks, the uncommitted changes might cause inconsistencies.- slackAlarmService.notifyReturn(userToReturn, history, unrefundedRentCount) - rentRepository.save(history) + rentRepository.save(history) + slackAlarmService.notifyReturn(userToReturn, history, unrefundedRentCount)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt(0 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ConditionReport.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt(2 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ImprovementReport.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt(7 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt
🔇 Additional comments (24)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ConditionReport.kt (1)
9-9: Changed history property from nullable to non-nullableThis change enforces that a
ConditionReportmust always have aHistoryassociated with it. This is a good improvement as it strengthens the data model and prevents null-related issues in the application logic.Make sure all code that creates
ConditionReportinstances has been updated to provide aHistoryobject, as this is a breaking change.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt (1)
18-21: Simplified service method with better separation of concernsThe old
addImprovementReportFromReturnmethod has been replaced with a more genericsavemethod that accepts a completeImprovementReportobject. This is a good refactoring that:
- Follows single responsibility principle better
- Simplifies the service API
- Moves object creation responsibility to the appropriate layer
Make sure all callers of the old method have been updated to create the
ImprovementReportobject before calling this method.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ImprovementReport.kt (2)
9-9: Changed history property from nullable to non-nullableThis change enforces that an
ImprovementReportmust always have aHistoryassociated with it. This is a good improvement as it strengthens the data model and prevents potential null pointer exceptions.Make sure all code that creates
ImprovementReportinstances has been updated to provide aHistoryobject, as this is a breaking change.
14-15: Removed companion object with factory methodThe companion object containing the
createFromReturnfactory method has been removed. This aligns with the changes inImprovementReportServicewhere the responsibility of creating the object has moved elsewhere.Ensure that all callers of the removed factory method have been updated to create
ImprovementReportobjects directly.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt (2)
32-32: Changed returnStoreMeta from val to varThe
returnStoreMetaproperty has been changed from immutable (val) to mutable (var). This provides flexibility for updating the return store information after aHistoryobject is created.This change is consistent with the removal of the
updateHistoryForReturnmethod from the companion object, suggesting that the approach has changed from creating new objects to updating existing ones.
122-122:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Removed updateHistoryForReturn method
The
updateHistoryForReturnfactory method has been removed from the companion object. This is consistent with makingrentStoreMetaandreturnStoreMetamutable, indicating a shift from creating new objects to updating existing ones.Make sure all code that previously called this method has been updated to update the fields directly on the existing
Historyobject.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to the removed method that need to be updated rg "updateHistoryForReturn" --type kotlinLength of output: 41
Action Required: Verify Removal of
updateHistoryForReturnReferencesThe shell script search for
updateHistoryForReturndid not return any matches, which suggests that the method has been removed and no remaining call sites appear in Kotlin files. However, the output is minimal and may be inconclusive. Please manually verify that all references to theupdateHistoryForReturnmethod (where updates torentStoreMetaandreturnStoreMetaoccur directly) have been successfully migrated.
- Ensure that all call sites have been updated to modify the existing
Historyobject directly instead of using the removed factory method.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt (5)
8-11: Imports are consistent with usage.
All newly imported classes (ConditionReport,History,ImprovementReport, andUser) are referenced in the notification methods below.
19-27: ValidaterentStoreMetanon-null usage.
The method safely constructs a Slack message usinghistory.rentStoreMeta.name. Ensure that the domain invariants guarantee a non-nullrentStoreMetato avoid potential null pointer issues. Otherwise, consider a fallback or error-handling path.
29-40: Return notification looks good.
This method provides a thorough message including rental/return details. The safe call onhistory.returnStoreMeta?.nameis a good way to handle a possibly null return store meta.
50-58: Condition report notification integrated successfully.
The function composes a concise report message with clear details for quick Slack reviews.
60-70: Improvement report notification integrated successfully.
Similar to condition reports, this well-structured message helps ensure timely awareness of improvement needs.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt (13)
12-12: Import forImprovementReportis valid.
It’s referenced in new logic for improvement reporting.
15-15: Import for SlackAlarmService is valid.
Slack notifications are triggered in the rental and return processes.
35-35: SlackAlarmService field introduced.
This addition ensures that rental and return flows can send Slack notifications.
71-81: Umbrella validation before rental.
Multiple checks confirm the umbrella is in the correct store, not missing, and actually rentable. This approach avoids inconsistent rental states.
84-84: Creates and saves rental history.
Storing a newHistoryobject accurately captures relevant umbrella and user data upon rental.
86-86: Notifying Slack after successful rental.
This timely notification helps keep track of new rentals and deposit requirements.
88-95: Condition reporting on rental.
Allowing an immediate condition report fosters better tracking of umbrella defects. The Slack notification keeps admins informed in real time.
105-108: Bank and return store details set.
Storing user banking info and linking the return store ensures all the data needed for refunds and logging is present.
118-124: Improvement report creation & Slack notification flow looks good.
This pattern parallels condition reports, ensuring consistency and immediate visibility of user feedback.
128-131: Refactored parameter formatting.
The multi-line approach for parameters improves readability.
147-150: Refactored logic for listing rental history.
No functional change is apparent; reorganizing the method signature is clear and consistent.
170-177: Refined day-ranges intoRentalHistoryResponse.
ReassigningelapsedDayand computingtotalRentalDayclarifies the difference between overall days vs. total days rented.
222-225: Refactored retrieval of history info.
Delegating data fetch torentRepository.findHistoryInfossimplifies code organization and keeps concerns separated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (3)
45-95: Good use of @beforeeach for test setupThe addition of a setUp method with @beforeeach improves test maintainability by centralizing test data initialization. This is a good practice as it reduces duplication and makes future test additions easier.
However, consider using more realistic test data - particularly the LocalDateTime values using year 1000 may not represent realistic usage scenarios.
- rentedAt = LocalDateTime.of(1000, 12, 3, 4, 24), - returnedAt = LocalDateTime.of(1000, 12, 3, 4, 25), - refundedAt = LocalDateTime.of(1000, 12, 3, 4, 26), + rentedAt = LocalDateTime.now().minusDays(2), + returnedAt = LocalDateTime.now().minusDays(1), + refundedAt = LocalDateTime.now(),
98-98: Consider updating the test display nameThe display name mentions "잔여 환급 개수와 함께" (with remaining refund count), but according to the PR changes, unrefunded rental tracking has been removed. Update the display name to reflect the current functionality being tested.
-@DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 잔여 환급 개수와 함께 알림이 전송된다.") +@DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 반납 알림이 전송된다.")
39-135: Consider adding tests for other notification typesThe PR objectives mention improving Slack messages for both umbrella rental and return processes. While you've updated the return notification test, consider adding tests for other notification types mentioned in the AI summary (rentals, condition reports, improvement reports).
@Test @DisplayName("우산을 대여하면 Slack 봇으로 대여 알림이 전송된다.") fun notifyRent() { // given given(slackBotConfig.webHookUrl).willReturn("https://hooks.slack.com/services") given( restTemplate.exchange( anyString(), any(HttpMethod::class.java), any(), any(Class::class.java) ) ).willReturn(null) // when slackAlarmService.notifyRent(userToRent, history, foundUmbrella) val requestEntityCaptor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(HttpEntity::class.java as Class<HttpEntity<Any>>) // then assertAll( { then(restTemplate).should(times(1)) .exchange( anyString(), any(HttpMethod::class.java), requestEntityCaptor.capture(), any(Class::class.java) ) }, { assertTrue( requestEntityCaptor.value.body.toString().contains("우산 대여 알림") ) } ) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (2)
112-112: Method signature updated correctlyThe call to
notifyReturnhas been updated to match the refactored method signature, which now takes more contextual information (user and history) for better notification details.
130-130: Test verification updated to match new notification messageThe assertion has been updated to check for "우산 반납 알림" (umbrella return notification) in the Slack message, which aligns with the PR objective of improving Slack messages for umbrella returns.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (1)
98-99: Ensure test description matches updated functionality.The test description still mentions "우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 잔여 환급 개수와 함께 알림이 전송된다" (When an umbrella is returned, a notification is sent via Slack bot along with the remaining refund count), but the assertion now checks for "우산 반납 알림" (umbrella return notification) instead of the refund count.
Consider updating the test description to match the new behavior being tested.
- @DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 잔여 환급 개수와 함께 알림이 전송된다.") + @DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 반납 알림이 전송된다.")Also applies to: 112-116, 130-130
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt(5 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt (1)
583-586: Good refactoring by removing unnecessary non-null assertions!The removal of non-null assertions (
!!) fromrequest.classificationIdandrequest.subClassificationIdmakes the code more idiomatic Kotlin by leveraging the type system's built-in null safety. This change suggests that these properties are now properly defined as non-nullable in theUpdateStoreRequestclass, eliminating the need for force unwrapping.src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (5)
5-5: Import statements updated to support new test setup.The new imports support the domain model objects and the
@BeforeEachsetup that was added, aligning with the changes to the test structure.Also applies to: 19-26
39-44: Added domain model fields for test clarity.Good addition of private fields to hold test objects. This improves readability by giving descriptive names to the objects used in the tests.
45-95: Well-structured test setup with comprehensive initialization.The
@BeforeEachsetup method properly initializes all required domain objects with realistic values. This approach:
- Centralizes test data creation
- Ensures consistent state before each test
- Makes the test methods cleaner by moving setup logic out of them
This is a good refactoring practice that improves test maintainability.
112-112: Updated method call to match new SlackAlarmService signature.The test now calls
notifyReturnwith the proper domain objects (user, history) and count, reflecting the updated implementation in the service layer.
114-116: Simplified assertion and updated expected message content.The assertion has been appropriately updated to verify the new message format contains "우산 반납 알림" (umbrella return notification) instead of a numeric count. The ArgumentCaptor usage has also been simplified.
Also applies to: 130-130
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaController.kt (1)
15-130: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider a more comprehensive approach to null safety
While some improvements have been made by removing force unwraps on the service reference, there are still several instances of the non-null assertion operator (
!!) in the controller methods. For better null safety and to fully achieve the PR's goal, consider:
- Making nullable parameters non-nullable in method signatures where appropriate
- Using the Elvis operator (
?:) with default values for nullable parameters- Adding proper validation before using nullable values
- Using Spring's
@NotNullannotation for required parametersThis would create a more consistent approach to null safety throughout the controller.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ImprovementReportResponse.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaController.kt(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ImprovementReportResponse.kt (1)
14-15: LGTM: Non-null property access aligns with entity changes.The direct access to
historyandumbrellaproperties (without safe calls) correctly reflects the enforcement of non-nullability in the underlyingImprovementReportentity, improving type safety and eliminating unnecessary null checks.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaController.kt (3)
90-90: Improved service method callThe force unwrap on
umbrellaServicehas been correctly removed, which is in line with the PR objectives.
112-112: Improved service method callThe force unwrap on
umbrellaServicehas been correctly removed, which aligns with the PR goal of removing unnecessary non-null assertions.
126-126: Improved service method callThe force unwrap on
umbrellaServicehas been correctly removed, improving the code's null safety.
| "지점 우산 현황 조회 성공", | ||
| UmbrellaPageResponse( | ||
| umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService!!.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable!!) | ||
| umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable!!) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-null assertion operator still being used
Similar to the previous instance, the code still force-unwraps the pageable parameter with the !! operator. This contradicts the goal of removing these assertions for better null safety.
- umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable!!)
+ umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable ?: Pageable.unpaged())| "전체 우산 현황 조회 성공", | ||
| UmbrellaPageResponse( | ||
| umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService!!.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!) | ||
| umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-null assertion operator still being used
This line still uses the non-null assertion operator (!!) on the pageable parameter. According to the PR objectives, one of the goals was to remove these force unwraps. Consider using a safe approach instead, such as providing a default value or making the parameter non-nullable in the method signature.
- umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!)
+ umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable ?: Pageable.unpaged())📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!) | |
| umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable ?: Pageable.unpaged()) |
| @PostMapping("/admin/umbrellas") | ||
| fun addUmbrella(@RequestBody umbrellaCreateRequest: @Valid UmbrellaCreateRequest?): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> { | ||
| umbrellaService!!.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!) | ||
| umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-null assertion operator still being used
The umbrellaCreateRequest parameter is still force-unwrapped with the !! operator. Consider adjusting the method signature to make the parameter non-nullable or implementing proper null handling.
- umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!)
+ umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null"))Alternatively, modify the method signature:
- fun addUmbrella(@RequestBody umbrellaCreateRequest: @Valid UmbrellaCreateRequest?): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
+ fun addUmbrella(@RequestBody @Valid umbrellaCreateRequest: UmbrellaCreateRequest): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!) | |
| umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null")) |
| @PathVariable id: Long | ||
| ): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> { | ||
| umbrellaService!!.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!) | ||
| umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-null assertion operator still being used
The umbrellaModifyRequest parameter is still being force-unwrapped. This doesn't align with the PR's goal of removing force unwraps.
- umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!)
+ umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null"))Alternatively, modify the method signature:
- fun modifyUmbrella(@RequestBody umbrellaModifyRequest: @Valid UmbrellaModifyRequest?, @PathVariable id: Long): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
+ fun modifyUmbrella(@RequestBody @Valid umbrellaModifyRequest: UmbrellaModifyRequest, @PathVariable id: Long): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!) | |
| umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella( | |
| id, | |
| - umbrellaModifyRequest!! | |
| + umbrellaModifyRequest | |
| + ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null") | |
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt (1)
1-72: New SlackAlarmService implementation looks good but consider adding error handlingThe implementation of the SlackAlarmService is well-structured with clear notification methods for different umbrella-related events. The code is organized logically with separate methods for rent, return, condition reports, and improvement reports.
Consider adding error handling to the
sendmethod to gracefully handle potential network issues or Slack API errors:private fun send(message: String) { val request = mutableMapOf<String, Any>( "text" to message ) val entity = HttpEntity(request) + try { restTemplate.exchange(slackBotConfig.webHookUrl, POST, entity, String::class.java) + } catch (e: Exception) { + // Log the error but don't fail the entire operation + logger.error("Failed to send Slack notification: ${e.message}", e) + } }src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/RentRepositoryImpl.kt (1)
30-30: Code style improvement by removing redundant semicolonsGood cleanup by removing the redundant semicolons. This makes the code more idiomatic Kotlin, which uses newlines rather than semicolons as statement terminators.
For consistency, you might want to run a static code analysis tool or IDE formatter on the entire codebase to ensure all redundant semicolons are removed.
Also applies to: 64-64, 85-85, 90-91, 99-99
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (42)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/DevCorsConfig.kt(0 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ConditionReportResponse.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/RentalHistoryResponse.kt(0 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt(2 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ConditionReportRepository.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ImprovementReportRepository.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/RentRepositoryImpl.kt(4 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt(7 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/dto/response/ImageUrlsResponse.kt(0 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/entity/StoreDetail.kt(0 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/ClassificationWriter.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailReader.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailRepository.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt(2 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageRepository.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreMetaRepository.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationService.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreImageService.kt(2 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaExceptionHandler.kt(4 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaCreateRequest.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaModifyRequest.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaPageResponse.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaResponse.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListService.kt(1 hunks)src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserService.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureBuilderFactory.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureFactory.kt(0 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/docs/common/CustomController.kt(2 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentControllerTest.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentServiceTest.kt(2 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt(5 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/BusinessHourServiceTest.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationServiceTest.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreMetaServiceTest.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaControllerTest.kt(8 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/service/UmbrellaServiceTest.kt(0 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListServiceTest.kt(1 hunks)src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserServiceTest.kt(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/entity/StoreDetail.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/service/UmbrellaServiceTest.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/DevCorsConfig.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/RentalHistoryResponse.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserServiceTest.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureFactory.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/dto/response/ImageUrlsResponse.kt
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationService.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreImageService.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaCreateRequest.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaPageResponse.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListService.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/docs/common/CustomController.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaResponse.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListServiceTest.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ImprovementReportRepository.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationServiceTest.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaExceptionHandler.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailReader.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaModifyRequest.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentServiceTest.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaControllerTest.kt
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt
- src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt
- src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/ClassificationWriter.kt (1)
1-18: Code cleanup is clean and appropriate.The removal of the
saveAllmethod and the unusedClassificationTypeimport aligns with the general code cleanup mentioned in the PR objectives. This simplification maintains the core functionality while removing unused code.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreMetaRepository.kt (1)
6-9: Repository interface cleanup looks good.The removal of the
findByClassificationIdAndDeletedIsFalsemethod aligns with the broader refactoring effort mentioned in the summary. This simplification of the repository interface helps reduce unused methods and follows good practices by keeping interfaces focused on methods that are actually needed.src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreMetaServiceTest.kt (1)
6-9: Import statements have been properly refined.The wildcard import of
org.junit.jupiter.api.*has been replaced with explicit imports of specific annotations that are actually used in the test class. This improves code readability by making it clear exactly which JUnit classes are being used.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailRepository.kt (1)
6-6: Repository interface simplification looks good.The simplification of the
StoreDetailRepositoryinterface by removing the explicit declaration of thefindStoreDetailByStoreMetaIdmethod and its related import is a good clean-up change. Spring Data JPA will still provide the implementation for query methods based on naming conventions, making the explicit declaration redundant. This change aligns with the broader code cleanup effort mentioned in the PR summary.src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserService.kt (1)
9-12: Import refactoring well done!The change from wildcard imports to explicit imports is a good practice that improves code clarity and helps prevent potential naming conflicts. This refactoring makes dependencies more visible and the code more maintainable.
Also applies to: 15-17
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureBuilderFactory.kt (1)
30-30: Good encapsulation improvement.Changing
fixtureMonkeyfrom public to private improves encapsulation by hiding the implementation details and enforcing access through the factory's builder methods. This aligns with proper object-oriented design principles and the Factory pattern.src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/BusinessHourServiceTest.kt (1)
104-104: Good use of Kotlin 1.9'sentriespropertyUpdating from
DayOfWeek.values()toDayOfWeek.entriesis a positive change. Theentriesproperty was introduced in Kotlin 1.9 as a more efficient alternative to thevalues()method, as it returns a pre-computed list rather than creating a new array on each call. This change follows Kotlin's best practices and future-proofs the code, asvalues()is planned for eventual deprecation.src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentControllerTest.kt (1)
36-36: Import path update looks goodThe import path for SlackAlarmService has been correctly updated to reflect the new package structure.
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ConditionReportResponse.kt (1)
14-14:Details
❌ Incorrect review comment
Removal of unnecessary non-null assertion
Good change removing the
!!non-null assertion. This assumes thatconditionReport.history.idis now guaranteed to be non-null, which improves type safety.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that ConditionReport.history is non-nullable to ensure this change is safe rg -A 10 "class ConditionReport" --type kotlinLength of output: 5335
Review comment is incorrect: non-null assertion still present and
History.idremains nullableThe DTO mapping still uses
conditionReport.history.id!!, and theHistory.idproperty is defined asLong?, so the non-null assertion is necessary here. The original comment praising its removal does not match the current code or the entity definition.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ConditionReportRepository.kt (1)
6-6: Code simplification looks good.This change removes the unnecessary empty braces
{}from the interface declaration, resulting in cleaner and more idiomatic Kotlin code. The functionality remains identical while making the codebase more consistent with modern Kotlin style.
| interface StoreImageRepository : JpaRepository<StoreImage, Long> { | ||
| fun findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId: Long): List<StoreImage> | ||
| } | ||
| interface StoreImageRepository : JpaRepository<StoreImage, Long> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Repository interface simplification looks good.
The simplification of the repository interface by removing the custom query method findByStoreDetailId aligns with modern Spring Data JPA practices. This change promotes cleaner code and relies on Spring's method naming conventions or uses alternative query mechanisms elsewhere in the codebase.
Please verify that the functionality previously provided by the findByStoreDetailId method is still available elsewhere in the codebase (possibly in a reader class or through standard JPA repository methods). You can run this script to check if there are any remaining references to this method:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the removed 'findByStoreDetailId' method
rg "findByStoreDetailId" --type kotlinLength of output: 38
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the removed 'findByStoreDetailId' method in Kotlin and Java
rg -n "findByStoreDetailId" --type kotlin --type java || true
# Search for any similar method names that might indicate an alternative derived query
rg -n "findByStoreDetail" --type kotlin --type java || true
# Search for invocations on the repository bean to catch any dynamic calls
rg -n "storeImageRepository\\.find" --type kotlin --type java || trueLength of output: 305
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the contents of StoreImageReader.kt to verify how store images are fetched by store detail ID
cat src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt || trueLength of output: 461
Missing repository method for fetching by storeDetailId
Our searches did not find any replacement for the removed findByStoreDetailId method—only findByIdOrNull(id) remains in StoreImageReader.kt. If your application still needs to load images by storeDetailId, you should reintroduce a derived query method. For example:
• In src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageRepository.kt
interface StoreImageRepository : JpaRepository<StoreImage, Long> {
fun findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId: Long): List<StoreImage>
}• In src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt
@Component
class StoreImageReader(
private val storeImageRepository: StoreImageRepository
) {
// Existing
fun findById(id: Long): StoreImage? =
storeImageRepository.findByIdOrNull(id)
// Re-add if needed:
fun findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId: Long): List<StoreImage> =
storeImageRepository.findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId)
}If that query is no longer used anywhere, you can safely remove any domain logic referring to storeDetailId.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml (1)
23-24: Specify Java distribution and version
Using the Temurin distribution with Java 17 is aligned with best practices. For even more stability and reproducibility, consider pinning the action release (e.g.,actions/[email protected]) and enabling Gradle’s built‑in caching:uses: actions/setup-java@v3 # ▲ pin to a specific v3.x.x release with: - distribution: 'temurin' - java-version: '17' + distribution: 'temurin' + java-version: '17' + cache: 'gradle'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml
21-21: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml (1)
20-20: Align CI with JDK 17 requirements
Switching this step to “Set up JDK 17” is correct given the codebase updates that leverage newer Java/Kotlin features. The step name is clear and matches the version specified below.
🟢 구현내용
메시지의 형태를 개선합니다.
고치는 김에 기존 코드 리팩토링도 살짝했습니다.
🧩 고민과 해결과정
Summary by CodeRabbit