Skip to content

Conversation

@Gwonwoo-Nam
Copy link
Contributor

@Gwonwoo-Nam Gwonwoo-Nam commented Apr 13, 2025

🟢 구현내용

메시지의 형태를 개선합니다.
고치는 김에 기존 코드 리팩토링도 살짝했습니다.

🧩 고민과 해결과정

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced notifications provide detailed updates for rental, return, condition, and improvement events.
  • Refactor
    • Streamlined rental and return workflows for increased accuracy and consistency.
    • Enforced non-nullable history properties in condition and improvement reports for reliable record keeping.
    • Simplified instantiation of improvement reports by removing factory methods.
    • Improved code clarity with idiomatic Kotlin collection operations and removal of redundant null assertions.
    • Consolidated improvement report handling into the main rental return process.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Removed obsolete Slack notification calls during umbrella return to prevent redundant alerts.
  • Tests
    • Added Slack notification mocking in rental service tests.
    • Updated Slack notification tests to verify detailed return messages.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 13, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

The changes remove unrefunded rental tracking and Slack notifications in the umbrella rental return flow within the controller. They enforce non-nullable history properties for condition and improvement reports and increase mutability of certain properties in the History entity while removing a history update method. The improvement report service replaces a parameter-based creation method with a direct save method. The rent service refactors rental and return methods for direct property assignments, integrates Slack notifications, reformats method signatures, and consolidates improvement report handling. The Slack alarm service is enhanced with new and updated notification methods for rentals, returns, condition reports, and improvement reports. Corresponding tests are updated to reflect these changes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/.../controller/RentController.kt Removed lines in returnUmbrellaByUser that counted unrefunded rentals and sent Slack notifications; changed import path for SlackAlarmService.
src/.../entity/ConditionReport.kt
src/.../entity/ImprovementReport.kt
Changed history property from nullable (History?) to non-nullable (History); removed companion object with factory method in ImprovementReport.
src/.../entity/History.kt Changed rentStoreMeta and returnStoreMeta from immutable (val) to mutable (var); removed updateHistoryForReturn method; removed unused import.
src/.../service/ImprovementReportService.kt Removed addImprovementReportFromReturn method; added save method accepting a complete ImprovementReport; removed unused import.
src/.../service/RentService.kt Refactored addRental and returnUmbrellaByUser for direct property assignments, added Slack notifications, reformatted method signatures, and removed private helper method for improvement reports.
src/.../slack/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt Replaced single-parameter notifyReturn with notifyRent(user, history); added new notifyReturn(user, history, unrefundedCount), notifyConditionReport, and notifyImprovementReport methods with detailed message formats.
src/test/.../SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt Added setUp method initializing test data; updated notifyReturn test to match new method signature and verify notification message content.
src/test/.../RentServiceTest.kt Added mock for SlackAlarmService and injected it into RentService tests.
src/.../store/service/StoreDetailService.kt Replaced Java Stream API usage with idiomatic Kotlin collection operations for sorting and mapping.
src/test/.../StoreDetailServiceTest.kt Removed forced non-null assertions (!!) in mock setup for classification IDs.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant U as User
  participant RS as RentService
  participant DB as Database
  participant SA as SlackAlarmService

  U->>RS: addRental(umbrella, rental info)
  RS->>DB: Save rental history
  RS->>SA: notifyRent(user, history)
  alt Condition report provided
    RS->>DB: Save condition report
    RS->>SA: notifyConditionReport(conditionReport)
  end
Loading
sequenceDiagram
  participant U as User
  participant RS as RentService
  participant DB as Database
  participant SA as SlackAlarmService
  participant IS as ImprovementReportService

  U->>RS: returnUmbrellaByUser(return info)
  RS->>DB: Update history (bank details, return store meta)
  RS->>SA: notifyReturn(user, history, unrefundedCount)
  alt Improvement report provided
    RS->>IS: save(improvementReport)
    RS->>SA: notifyImprovementReport(improvementReport)
  end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • birdieHyun

Poem

I'm a bunny coder, hopping with delight,
Updating code carrots with every byte.
History shines now, firm and clear,
Slack sings the news for all to hear.
In the garden of code, changes bloom so bright –
A joyful hop to a future coded right!
🥕🐇
"""

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


Note

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching

CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9272c1a and 26069ef.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/integration/UserIntegrationTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/resources/application-test.yml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/test/resources/application-test.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/integration/UserIntegrationTest.kt (1)

478-479: Improved test resilience with repository pattern

The change from directly accessing the EntityManager with a fixed ID to using the repository pattern makes the test more robust. It no longer assumes a specific ID generation strategy and properly embraces the repository abstraction.

However, consider adding more specific verification of the created user's properties to ensure it's the one from the join request:

val user = userRepository.findAll().firstOrNull()
assertThat(user).isNotNull
+assertThat(user?.name).isEqualTo(joinRequest.name)
+assertThat(aesEncryptor.decrypt(user?.phoneNumber)).isEqualTo(joinRequest.phoneNumber)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt (1)

28-28: Changed rentStoreMeta from val to var

The rentStoreMeta property has been changed from immutable (val) to mutable (var). This increases flexibility by allowing the rental store to be updated after a History object is created.

While this provides more flexibility, ensure proper validation is in place when this property is modified to maintain data integrity.

Consider adding a setter method with validation instead of directly exposing a mutable property, especially for important entity relationships:

-var rentStoreMeta: StoreMeta,
+val rentStoreMeta: StoreMeta,
+
+fun updateRentStore(newStore: StoreMeta) {
+    // Add any validation logic here
+    this.rentStoreMeta = newStore
+}
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt (2)

113-113: Potential performance concern for frequent calls.
countUnrefundedRent() might be called repeatedly if returns happen in quick succession. Consider caching or batching if performance becomes an issue.


115-116: Order of operations in notifyReturn vs. save.
Consider persisting history before calling notifyReturn. If the Slack message triggers any downstream checks, the uncommitted changes might cause inconsistencies.

- slackAlarmService.notifyReturn(userToReturn, history, unrefundedRentCount)
- rentRepository.save(history)
+ rentRepository.save(history)
+ slackAlarmService.notifyReturn(userToReturn, history, unrefundedRentCount)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ce4bd05 and b37c5c5.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt (0 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ConditionReport.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt (2 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ImprovementReport.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt (7 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt
🔇 Additional comments (24)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ConditionReport.kt (1)

9-9: Changed history property from nullable to non-nullable

This change enforces that a ConditionReport must always have a History associated with it. This is a good improvement as it strengthens the data model and prevents null-related issues in the application logic.

Make sure all code that creates ConditionReport instances has been updated to provide a History object, as this is a breaking change.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt (1)

18-21: Simplified service method with better separation of concerns

The old addImprovementReportFromReturn method has been replaced with a more generic save method that accepts a complete ImprovementReport object. This is a good refactoring that:

  1. Follows single responsibility principle better
  2. Simplifies the service API
  3. Moves object creation responsibility to the appropriate layer

Make sure all callers of the old method have been updated to create the ImprovementReport object before calling this method.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/ImprovementReport.kt (2)

9-9: Changed history property from nullable to non-nullable

This change enforces that an ImprovementReport must always have a History associated with it. This is a good improvement as it strengthens the data model and prevents potential null pointer exceptions.

Make sure all code that creates ImprovementReport instances has been updated to provide a History object, as this is a breaking change.


14-15: Removed companion object with factory method

The companion object containing the createFromReturn factory method has been removed. This aligns with the changes in ImprovementReportService where the responsibility of creating the object has moved elsewhere.

Ensure that all callers of the removed factory method have been updated to create ImprovementReport objects directly.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt (2)

32-32: Changed returnStoreMeta from val to var

The returnStoreMeta property has been changed from immutable (val) to mutable (var). This provides flexibility for updating the return store information after a History object is created.

This change is consistent with the removal of the updateHistoryForReturn method from the companion object, suggesting that the approach has changed from creating new objects to updating existing ones.


122-122:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Removed updateHistoryForReturn method

The updateHistoryForReturn factory method has been removed from the companion object. This is consistent with making rentStoreMeta and returnStoreMeta mutable, indicating a shift from creating new objects to updating existing ones.

Make sure all code that previously called this method has been updated to update the fields directly on the existing History object.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the removed method that need to be updated
rg "updateHistoryForReturn" --type kotlin

Length of output: 41


Action Required: Verify Removal of updateHistoryForReturn References

The shell script search for updateHistoryForReturn did not return any matches, which suggests that the method has been removed and no remaining call sites appear in Kotlin files. However, the output is minimal and may be inconclusive. Please manually verify that all references to the updateHistoryForReturn method (where updates to rentStoreMeta and returnStoreMeta occur directly) have been successfully migrated.

  • Ensure that all call sites have been updated to modify the existing History object directly instead of using the removed factory method.
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt (5)

8-11: Imports are consistent with usage.
All newly imported classes (ConditionReport, History, ImprovementReport, and User) are referenced in the notification methods below.


19-27: Validate rentStoreMeta non-null usage.
The method safely constructs a Slack message using history.rentStoreMeta.name. Ensure that the domain invariants guarantee a non-null rentStoreMeta to avoid potential null pointer issues. Otherwise, consider a fallback or error-handling path.


29-40: Return notification looks good.
This method provides a thorough message including rental/return details. The safe call on history.returnStoreMeta?.name is a good way to handle a possibly null return store meta.


50-58: Condition report notification integrated successfully.
The function composes a concise report message with clear details for quick Slack reviews.


60-70: Improvement report notification integrated successfully.
Similar to condition reports, this well-structured message helps ensure timely awareness of improvement needs.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt (13)

12-12: Import for ImprovementReport is valid.
It’s referenced in new logic for improvement reporting.


15-15: Import for SlackAlarmService is valid.
Slack notifications are triggered in the rental and return processes.


35-35: SlackAlarmService field introduced.
This addition ensures that rental and return flows can send Slack notifications.


71-81: Umbrella validation before rental.
Multiple checks confirm the umbrella is in the correct store, not missing, and actually rentable. This approach avoids inconsistent rental states.


84-84: Creates and saves rental history.
Storing a new History object accurately captures relevant umbrella and user data upon rental.


86-86: Notifying Slack after successful rental.
This timely notification helps keep track of new rentals and deposit requirements.


88-95: Condition reporting on rental.
Allowing an immediate condition report fosters better tracking of umbrella defects. The Slack notification keeps admins informed in real time.


105-108: Bank and return store details set.
Storing user banking info and linking the return store ensures all the data needed for refunds and logging is present.


118-124: Improvement report creation & Slack notification flow looks good.
This pattern parallels condition reports, ensuring consistency and immediate visibility of user feedback.


128-131: Refactored parameter formatting.
The multi-line approach for parameters improves readability.


147-150: Refactored logic for listing rental history.
No functional change is apparent; reorganizing the method signature is clear and consistent.


170-177: Refined day-ranges in toRentalHistoryResponse.
Reassigning elapsedDay and computing totalRentalDay clarifies the difference between overall days vs. total days rented.


222-225: Refactored retrieval of history info.
Delegating data fetch to rentRepository.findHistoryInfos simplifies code organization and keeps concerns separated.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (3)

45-95: Good use of @beforeeach for test setup

The addition of a setUp method with @beforeeach improves test maintainability by centralizing test data initialization. This is a good practice as it reduces duplication and makes future test additions easier.

However, consider using more realistic test data - particularly the LocalDateTime values using year 1000 may not represent realistic usage scenarios.

-            rentedAt = LocalDateTime.of(1000, 12, 3, 4, 24),
-            returnedAt = LocalDateTime.of(1000, 12, 3, 4, 25),
-            refundedAt = LocalDateTime.of(1000, 12, 3, 4, 26),
+            rentedAt = LocalDateTime.now().minusDays(2),
+            returnedAt = LocalDateTime.now().minusDays(1),
+            refundedAt = LocalDateTime.now(),

98-98: Consider updating the test display name

The display name mentions "잔여 환급 개수와 함께" (with remaining refund count), but according to the PR changes, unrefunded rental tracking has been removed. Update the display name to reflect the current functionality being tested.

-@DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 잔여 환급 개수와 함께 알림이 전송된다.")
+@DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 반납 알림이 전송된다.")

39-135: Consider adding tests for other notification types

The PR objectives mention improving Slack messages for both umbrella rental and return processes. While you've updated the return notification test, consider adding tests for other notification types mentioned in the AI summary (rentals, condition reports, improvement reports).

@Test
@DisplayName("우산을 대여하면 Slack 봇으로 대여 알림이 전송된다.")
fun notifyRent() {
    // given
    given(slackBotConfig.webHookUrl).willReturn("https://hooks.slack.com/services")
    given(
        restTemplate.exchange(
            anyString(),
            any(HttpMethod::class.java),
            any(),
            any(Class::class.java)
        )
    ).willReturn(null)

    // when
    slackAlarmService.notifyRent(userToRent, history, foundUmbrella)

    val requestEntityCaptor =
        ArgumentCaptor.forClass(HttpEntity::class.java as Class<HttpEntity<Any>>)
    // then

    assertAll(
        {
            then(restTemplate).should(times(1))
                .exchange(
                    anyString(),
                    any(HttpMethod::class.java),
                    requestEntityCaptor.capture(),
                    any(Class::class.java)
                )
        },
        {
            assertTrue(
                requestEntityCaptor.value.body.toString().contains("우산 대여 알림")
            )
        }
    )
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b37c5c5 and 2fa02fd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (2)

112-112: Method signature updated correctly

The call to notifyReturn has been updated to match the refactored method signature, which now takes more contextual information (user and history) for better notification details.


130-130: Test verification updated to match new notification message

The assertion has been updated to check for "우산 반납 알림" (umbrella return notification) in the Slack message, which aligns with the PR objective of improving Slack messages for umbrella returns.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (1)

98-99: Ensure test description matches updated functionality.

The test description still mentions "우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 잔여 환급 개수와 함께 알림이 전송된다" (When an umbrella is returned, a notification is sent via Slack bot along with the remaining refund count), but the assertion now checks for "우산 반납 알림" (umbrella return notification) instead of the refund count.

Consider updating the test description to match the new behavior being tested.

- @DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 잔여 환급 개수와 함께 알림이 전송된다.")
+ @DisplayName("우산을 반납하면 Slack 봇으로 반납 알림이 전송된다.")

Also applies to: 112-116, 130-130

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 06724d3 and 5e046cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (5 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt (1)

583-586: Good refactoring by removing unnecessary non-null assertions!

The removal of non-null assertions (!!) from request.classificationId and request.subClassificationId makes the code more idiomatic Kotlin by leveraging the type system's built-in null safety. This change suggests that these properties are now properly defined as non-nullable in the UpdateStoreRequest class, eliminating the need for force unwrapping.

src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (5)

5-5: Import statements updated to support new test setup.

The new imports support the domain model objects and the @BeforeEach setup that was added, aligning with the changes to the test structure.

Also applies to: 19-26


39-44: Added domain model fields for test clarity.

Good addition of private fields to hold test objects. This improves readability by giving descriptive names to the objects used in the tests.


45-95: Well-structured test setup with comprehensive initialization.

The @BeforeEach setup method properly initializes all required domain objects with realistic values. This approach:

  1. Centralizes test data creation
  2. Ensures consistent state before each test
  3. Makes the test methods cleaner by moving setup logic out of them

This is a good refactoring practice that improves test maintainability.


112-112: Updated method call to match new SlackAlarmService signature.

The test now calls notifyReturn with the proper domain objects (user, history) and count, reflecting the updated implementation in the service layer.


114-116: Simplified assertion and updated expected message content.

The assertion has been appropriately updated to verify the new message format contains "우산 반납 알림" (umbrella return notification) instead of a numeric count. The ArgumentCaptor usage has also been simplified.

Also applies to: 130-130

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaController.kt (1)

15-130: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider a more comprehensive approach to null safety

While some improvements have been made by removing force unwraps on the service reference, there are still several instances of the non-null assertion operator (!!) in the controller methods. For better null safety and to fully achieve the PR's goal, consider:

  1. Making nullable parameters non-nullable in method signatures where appropriate
  2. Using the Elvis operator (?:) with default values for nullable parameters
  3. Adding proper validation before using nullable values
  4. Using Spring's @NotNull annotation for required parameters

This would create a more consistent approach to null safety throughout the controller.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e046cd and d8918d2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ImprovementReportResponse.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaController.kt (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ImprovementReportResponse.kt (1)

14-15: LGTM: Non-null property access aligns with entity changes.

The direct access to history and umbrella properties (without safe calls) correctly reflects the enforcement of non-nullability in the underlying ImprovementReport entity, improving type safety and eliminating unnecessary null checks.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaController.kt (3)

90-90: Improved service method call

The force unwrap on umbrellaService has been correctly removed, which is in line with the PR objectives.


112-112: Improved service method call

The force unwrap on umbrellaService has been correctly removed, which aligns with the PR goal of removing unnecessary non-null assertions.


126-126: Improved service method call

The force unwrap on umbrellaService has been correctly removed, improving the code's null safety.

"지점 우산 현황 조회 성공",
UmbrellaPageResponse(
umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService!!.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable!!)
umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable!!)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Non-null assertion operator still being used

Similar to the previous instance, the code still force-unwraps the pageable parameter with the !! operator. This contradicts the goal of removing these assertions for better null safety.

- umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable!!)
+ umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findUmbrellasByStoreId(storeId, pageable ?: Pageable.unpaged())

"전체 우산 현황 조회 성공",
UmbrellaPageResponse(
umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService!!.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!)
umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Non-null assertion operator still being used

This line still uses the non-null assertion operator (!!) on the pageable parameter. According to the PR objectives, one of the goals was to remove these force unwraps. Consider using a safe approach instead, such as providing a default value or making the parameter non-nullable in the method signature.

- umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!)
+ umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable ?: Pageable.unpaged())
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable!!)
umbrellaResponsePage = umbrellaService.findAllUmbrellas(pageable ?: Pageable.unpaged())

@PostMapping("/admin/umbrellas")
fun addUmbrella(@RequestBody umbrellaCreateRequest: @Valid UmbrellaCreateRequest?): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
umbrellaService!!.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!)
umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Non-null assertion operator still being used

The umbrellaCreateRequest parameter is still force-unwrapped with the !! operator. Consider adjusting the method signature to make the parameter non-nullable or implementing proper null handling.

- umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!)
+ umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null"))

Alternatively, modify the method signature:

- fun addUmbrella(@RequestBody umbrellaCreateRequest: @Valid UmbrellaCreateRequest?): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
+ fun addUmbrella(@RequestBody @Valid umbrellaCreateRequest: UmbrellaCreateRequest): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest!!)
umbrellaService.addUmbrella(umbrellaCreateRequest ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null"))

@PathVariable id: Long
): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
umbrellaService!!.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!)
umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Non-null assertion operator still being used

The umbrellaModifyRequest parameter is still being force-unwrapped. This doesn't align with the PR's goal of removing force unwraps.

- umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!)
+ umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null"))

Alternatively, modify the method signature:

- fun modifyUmbrella(@RequestBody umbrellaModifyRequest: @Valid UmbrellaModifyRequest?, @PathVariable id: Long): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
+ fun modifyUmbrella(@RequestBody @Valid umbrellaModifyRequest: UmbrellaModifyRequest, @PathVariable id: Long): ResponseEntity<CustomResponse<*>> {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(id, umbrellaModifyRequest!!)
umbrellaService.modifyUmbrella(
id,
- umbrellaModifyRequest!!
+ umbrellaModifyRequest
+ ?: throw IllegalArgumentException("Request body cannot be null")
)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt (1)

1-72: New SlackAlarmService implementation looks good but consider adding error handling

The implementation of the SlackAlarmService is well-structured with clear notification methods for different umbrella-related events. The code is organized logically with separate methods for rent, return, condition reports, and improvement reports.

Consider adding error handling to the send method to gracefully handle potential network issues or Slack API errors:

private fun send(message: String) {
    val request = mutableMapOf<String, Any>(
        "text" to message
    )
    val entity = HttpEntity(request)
+   try {
        restTemplate.exchange(slackBotConfig.webHookUrl, POST, entity, String::class.java)
+   } catch (e: Exception) {
+       // Log the error but don't fail the entire operation
+       logger.error("Failed to send Slack notification: ${e.message}", e)
+   }
}
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/RentRepositoryImpl.kt (1)

30-30: Code style improvement by removing redundant semicolons

Good cleanup by removing the redundant semicolons. This makes the code more idiomatic Kotlin, which uses newlines rather than semicolons as statement terminators.

For consistency, you might want to run a static code analysis tool or IDE formatter on the entire codebase to ensure all redundant semicolons are removed.

Also applies to: 64-64, 85-85, 90-91, 99-99

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d8918d2 and 3b7999c.

📒 Files selected for processing (42)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/DevCorsConfig.kt (0 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ConditionReportResponse.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/RentalHistoryResponse.kt (0 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt (2 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ConditionReportRepository.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ImprovementReportRepository.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/RentRepositoryImpl.kt (4 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt (7 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/SlackAlarmService.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/dto/response/ImageUrlsResponse.kt (0 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/entity/StoreDetail.kt (0 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/ClassificationWriter.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailReader.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailRepository.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt (2 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageRepository.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreMetaRepository.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationService.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreImageService.kt (2 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaExceptionHandler.kt (4 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaCreateRequest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaModifyRequest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaPageResponse.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaResponse.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListService.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserService.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureBuilderFactory.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureFactory.kt (0 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/docs/common/CustomController.kt (2 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentControllerTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentServiceTest.kt (2 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt (5 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/BusinessHourServiceTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationServiceTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreMetaServiceTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaControllerTest.kt (8 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/service/UmbrellaServiceTest.kt (0 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListServiceTest.kt (1 hunks)
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserServiceTest.kt (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/entity/StoreDetail.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/service/UmbrellaServiceTest.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/DevCorsConfig.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/RentalHistoryResponse.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserServiceTest.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureFactory.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/dto/response/ImageUrlsResponse.kt
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationService.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreImageService.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaCreateRequest.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaPageResponse.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListService.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/docs/common/CustomController.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/response/UmbrellaResponse.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/BlackListServiceTest.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ImprovementReportRepository.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/ClassificationServiceTest.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaExceptionHandler.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailReader.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/dto/request/UmbrellaModifyRequest.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentServiceTest.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/umbrella/controller/UmbrellaControllerTest.kt
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/ImprovementReportService.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentController.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/slack/service/SlackAlarmServiceTest.kt
  • src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreDetailServiceTest.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/entity/History.kt
  • src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/service/RentService.kt
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/ClassificationWriter.kt (1)

1-18: Code cleanup is clean and appropriate.

The removal of the saveAll method and the unused ClassificationType import aligns with the general code cleanup mentioned in the PR objectives. This simplification maintains the core functionality while removing unused code.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreMetaRepository.kt (1)

6-9: Repository interface cleanup looks good.

The removal of the findByClassificationIdAndDeletedIsFalse method aligns with the broader refactoring effort mentioned in the summary. This simplification of the repository interface helps reduce unused methods and follows good practices by keeping interfaces focused on methods that are actually needed.

src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/StoreMetaServiceTest.kt (1)

6-9: Import statements have been properly refined.

The wildcard import of org.junit.jupiter.api.* has been replaced with explicit imports of specific annotations that are actually used in the test class. This improves code readability by making it clear exactly which JUnit classes are being used.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreDetailRepository.kt (1)

6-6: Repository interface simplification looks good.

The simplification of the StoreDetailRepository interface by removing the explicit declaration of the findStoreDetailByStoreMetaId method and its related import is a good clean-up change. Spring Data JPA will still provide the implementation for query methods based on naming conventions, making the explicit declaration redundant. This change aligns with the broader code cleanup effort mentioned in the PR summary.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/user/service/UserService.kt (1)

9-12: Import refactoring well done!

The change from wildcard imports to explicit imports is a good practice that improves code clarity and helps prevent potential naming conflicts. This refactoring makes dependencies more visible and the code more maintainable.

Also applies to: 15-17

src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/config/FixtureBuilderFactory.kt (1)

30-30: Good encapsulation improvement.

Changing fixtureMonkey from public to private improves encapsulation by hiding the implementation details and enforcing access through the factory's builder methods. This aligns with proper object-oriented design principles and the Factory pattern.

src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/service/BusinessHourServiceTest.kt (1)

104-104: Good use of Kotlin 1.9's entries property

Updating from DayOfWeek.values() to DayOfWeek.entries is a positive change. The entries property was introduced in Kotlin 1.9 as a more efficient alternative to the values() method, as it returns a pre-computed list rather than creating a new array on each call. This change follows Kotlin's best practices and future-proofs the code, as values() is planned for eventual deprecation.

src/test/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/controller/RentControllerTest.kt (1)

36-36: Import path update looks good

The import path for SlackAlarmService has been correctly updated to reflect the new package structure.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/dto/response/ConditionReportResponse.kt (1)

14-14:

Details

❌ Incorrect review comment

Removal of unnecessary non-null assertion

Good change removing the !! non-null assertion. This assumes that conditionReport.history.id is now guaranteed to be non-null, which improves type safety.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that ConditionReport.history is non-nullable to ensure this change is safe
rg -A 10 "class ConditionReport" --type kotlin

Length of output: 5335


Review comment is incorrect: non-null assertion still present and History.id remains nullable

The DTO mapping still uses conditionReport.history.id!!, and the History.id property is defined as Long?, so the non-null assertion is necessary here. The original comment praising its removal does not match the current code or the entity definition.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/rent/repository/ConditionReportRepository.kt (1)

6-6: Code simplification looks good.

This change removes the unnecessary empty braces {} from the interface declaration, resulting in cleaner and more idiomatic Kotlin code. The functionality remains identical while making the codebase more consistent with modern Kotlin style.

interface StoreImageRepository : JpaRepository<StoreImage, Long> {
fun findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId: Long): List<StoreImage>
}
interface StoreImageRepository : JpaRepository<StoreImage, Long>
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Repository interface simplification looks good.

The simplification of the repository interface by removing the custom query method findByStoreDetailId aligns with modern Spring Data JPA practices. This change promotes cleaner code and relies on Spring's method naming conventions or uses alternative query mechanisms elsewhere in the codebase.

Please verify that the functionality previously provided by the findByStoreDetailId method is still available elsewhere in the codebase (possibly in a reader class or through standard JPA repository methods). You can run this script to check if there are any remaining references to this method:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the removed 'findByStoreDetailId' method
rg "findByStoreDetailId" --type kotlin

Length of output: 38


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the removed 'findByStoreDetailId' method in Kotlin and Java
rg -n "findByStoreDetailId" --type kotlin --type java || true

# Search for any similar method names that might indicate an alternative derived query
rg -n "findByStoreDetail" --type kotlin --type java || true

# Search for invocations on the repository bean to catch any dynamic calls
rg -n "storeImageRepository\\.find" --type kotlin --type java || true

Length of output: 305


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Display the contents of StoreImageReader.kt to verify how store images are fetched by store detail ID
cat src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt || true

Length of output: 461


Missing repository method for fetching by storeDetailId

Our searches did not find any replacement for the removed findByStoreDetailId method—only findByIdOrNull(id) remains in StoreImageReader.kt. If your application still needs to load images by storeDetailId, you should reintroduce a derived query method. For example:

• In src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageRepository.kt

interface StoreImageRepository : JpaRepository<StoreImage, Long> {
    fun findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId: Long): List<StoreImage>
}

• In src/main/kotlin/upbrella/be/store/repository/StoreImageReader.kt

@Component
class StoreImageReader(
    private val storeImageRepository: StoreImageRepository
) {
    // Existing
    fun findById(id: Long): StoreImage? =
        storeImageRepository.findByIdOrNull(id)

    // Re-add if needed:
    fun findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId: Long): List<StoreImage> =
        storeImageRepository.findByStoreDetailId(storeDetailId)
}

If that query is no longer used anywhere, you can safely remove any domain logic referring to storeDetailId.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml (1)

23-24: Specify Java distribution and version
Using the Temurin distribution with Java 17 is aligned with best practices. For even more stability and reproducibility, consider pinning the action release (e.g., actions/[email protected]) and enabling Gradle’s built‑in caching:

 uses: actions/setup-java@v3          # ▲ pin to a specific v3.x.x release
 with:
-  distribution: 'temurin'
-  java-version: '17'
+  distribution: 'temurin'
+  java-version: '17'
+  cache: 'gradle'
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef5bc4a and 8dddcba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml

21-21: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/dev-pr-test.yml (1)

20-20: Align CI with JDK 17 requirements
Switching this step to “Set up JDK 17” is correct given the codebase updates that leverage newer Java/Kotlin features. The step name is clear and matches the version specified below.

@Gwonwoo-Nam Gwonwoo-Nam merged commit a82705a into dev May 18, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants