Skip to content

Small updates for signUt analysis#674

Open
rubenforti wants to merge 51 commits intoWMass:mainfrom
rubenforti:signUtAnalysis
Open

Small updates for signUt analysis#674
rubenforti wants to merge 51 commits intoWMass:mainfrom
rubenforti:signUtAnalysis

Conversation

@rubenforti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

To be merged after Marco's PR (#643 for now)

cippy and others added 30 commits October 17, 2025 15:44
… analysis bins of specific axes (e.g. utAngleSign) which have identically zero yield in the A-Ax-B-Bx regions

(cherry picked from commit 773c1d9)
… analysis bins of specific axes (e.g. utAngleSign) which have identically zero yield in the A-Ax-B-Bx regions
…current version of Rabbit, it will be probably reverted when the definitions of poi/noi/nuisanceNotConstrained are fixed
…ion on uT>0 with an hardcoded factor (normalization)
cippy and others added 21 commits January 11, 2026 17:23
…herrypick

    Merge from cippy/main_mergeUpstream_testRuben
…herrypick

    Merge from cippy/main_mergeUpstream_testRuben
Sync with upstream and latest updates by Marco
…herrypick

    Merge from cippy/main_mergeUpstream_testRuben
@davidwalter2
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Is this still needed after #678 has been merged? If so, can it be updated?

@cippy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

cippy commented Apr 1, 2026

Is this still needed after #678 has been merged? If so, can it be updated?

Hi David, it should still have some changes that are worth propagating. @rubenforti should update it to fix conflicts.

@rubenforti
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

I think it should be dropped. The changes simply consist in an update on naming conventions (only the last commit is not included in the current Wmass/main), they may be included in a later PR

@cippy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

cippy commented Apr 7, 2026

I think it should be dropped. The changes simply consist in an update on naming conventions (only the last commit is not included in the current Wmass/main), they may be included in a later PR

ok, then you might directly open a new one with the reduced set of modifications with respect to the current main, so it is easier to review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants