Project 6 grading

Project6/rubric.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# GRADE: 42/48 
+
+## Functional and implementation requirements: 23/28 points total
+
+### Menu: 1/2 points
+
+Earned|Possible|Requirement  | Comments
+------|--------|-------------|-
+1|1|Add **Undo** and **Redo** menu items to the **Edit** menu. The **Undo** menu item should have a keyboard equivalent of Ctrl/Cmd-Z. The **Redo** menu item should have a keyboard equivalent Ctrl/Cmd-Shift-Z.
+0|1|Put a separator between them and the other **Edit** menu items.
+0|0|**Undo** is disabled when the program starts and when all actions have been undone; it is enabled when the first action is taken. | _Addressed in the Project 7 rubric_
+0|0|**Redo** is disabled unless there is an action to redo.
+0|0|**Group** is disabled when there are fewer than two items selected.
+0|0|**Ungroup** is disabled when the selection is not (or does not contain) a gesture.
+0|0|**Delete** is disabled when nothing is selected.
+0|0|**Play** is disabled when there are no notes.
+0|0|**Stop** is disabled when the composition is not playing.
+
+### Undo/redo operations: 14/18 points
+
+1 pt each|Undo|Redo
+---------|----|----
+Add      |1|1
+Select   |1|1
+Delete   |1|1
+Move     |1|1
+Stretch  |1|1
+Group    |1|1
+Ungroup  |0|0
+
+Earned|Possible|Requirement
+------|--------|------------
+2|4|If notes are deleted, edited, or selected as a group, for example, through a gesture or by using the **Select All** menu item, then an undo operation should affect all of the notes. | _Muliple selection is good; undo/redo on manipulating a gesture is buggy._
+
+### Undo/redo stack: 8/8 points
+
+Earned|Possible|Requirement
+------|--------|------------
+4|4|The user should be allowed to undo actions repeatedly, all the way back to the original blank composition pane when the application was first started.
+2|2|Similarly, if a sequence of undo actions was performed, then the user should be allowed to redo the whole sequence.
+2|2|Taking a new action should clear the redo stack.
+
+### No regressions - 0/0 points
+
+All prior requirements are met, unless they have been superseded by new requirements.  (I will not replicate points taken off in Project 5.) _Not assessed to avoid double jeopardy_
+
+## Release - 2/2 points
+Earned|Possible|Requirement
+------|--------|------------
+2|2| The release is tagged as project-6-release.
+
+## Reflection and elegance - 17/18 points
+
+Earned|Possible|Requirement
+------|--------|------------
+3|4| UML diagram is accurate and complete. | _You tried, but it's hard to tell. An overview photo would have been helpful._
+3|3| Design overview addresses strategy for Undo/Redo.
+3|3| Design overview addresses strategy for disabling/enabling menu items or other changes from Project 5.
+6|6| Assessment of what is elegant and what is not thoughtfully addresses object-oriented design principles.
+1|1| Velocity is presented. 
+1|1| Team retrospective is presented.
+
+_You should be skeptical about blanket claims that dequeues are more efficient than stacks (or that any ADT is more efficient than another). More efficient for what? Their interfaces are similar enough that they might have the same underlying implementation. I would expect no difference in efficiency as long as you choose the right ADT for your needs._
+
+_Thanks for your detailed analysis of velocity. I'm sorry my suggested refactorings led you astray._