Skip to content

Conversation

abravalheri
Copy link
Owner

This is an investigation on the suggestion in TheKevJames/coveralls-python#434 (comment).

@henryiii henryiii force-pushed the workaround-coveralls-2 branch from b65ae50 to 16a2eaa Compare March 12, 2025 22:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant