feat: support Shakapacker v9 #627
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
G-Rath
force-pushed
the
upgrade-shakapacker
branch
from
f88979d to
0dd4be5
Compare
G-Rath
force-pushed
the
upgrade-shakapacker
branch
from
0dd4be5 to
7265d58
Compare
G-Rath
requested review from
JacobBriggsAckama,
eoinkelly,
halles,
hmaddocks,
hopkincame,
joshmcarthur,
lukeify and
robotdana
JacobBriggsAckama
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Shakapacker v9 brings support for Rspack as an alternative to webpack, and changes the default transpiler from Babel to SWC.
While it would be interesting to explore these new options, for now I've had us stick with webpack and babel.
See here for the upgrade notes